-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat!: initial deposit requirement for proposals #12771
Conversation
My hero ❤️❤️❤️ |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #12771 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 56.16% 56.31% +0.15%
==========================================
Files 645 649 +4
Lines 54660 54955 +295
==========================================
+ Hits 30699 30948 +249
- Misses 21485 21520 +35
- Partials 2476 2487 +11
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
left one comment otherwise looks good
Thanks for the reviews. @marbar3778 the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ Ref: https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.0.0/ | |||
* (x/gov) [#12631](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/pull/12631) Migrate `x/gov` to self-managed parameters and deprecate it's usage of `x/params`. | |||
* (x/staking) [#12409](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/pull/12409) Migrate `x/staking` to self-managed parameters and deprecate it's usage of `x/params`. | |||
* (x/bank) [#11859](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/pull/11859) Move the SendEnabled information out of the Params and into the state store directly. | |||
* (x/gov) [#12771](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/pull/12771) Initial deposit requirement for proposals at submission time. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
could you add a short entry to the upgrading.md file. then lets merge.
Upgrading.md is updated. Should be ready for merge unless there a issues in the upgrading doc |
Should this get backported? Otherwise, the upgrading.md addition is at the wrong place. |
## Description #12771 (comment) ### Author Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and please add links to any relevant follow up issues.* I have... - [ ] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)) - [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification - [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/docs/building-modules) - [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing) - [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md` - [ ] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc) - [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification - [ ] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary - [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed ### Reviewers Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.* I have... - [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change - [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed - [ ] reviewed state machine logic - [ ] reviewed API design and naming - [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate - [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage - [ ] manually tested (if applicable)
I do not believe this is being backported, no. |
Description
Closes: #12450
Original work:
This change adds the ability to require an initial deposit imposed on the proposer at proposal submission.
The deposit is burned if the proposal does not move to the voting period (the deposit is not submitted in full) or if vetoed by more than 1/3.
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
to the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.md
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking change