-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 195
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
upgrade --preview does not account for layered packages #864
Comments
In general can we not talk about This particular issue is really root caused by #391 In general I'd prefer to go down the route of automatic updates; we discussed that previously. |
Closing as a dup of #391 |
not sure why - it's a pretty awesome feature. I use it all the time to check if an upgrade contains a version of an RPM I'm interested in yet.
How does it conflict with deltas? I know it doesn't use deltas, but that's the whole point of |
FTR, this is fixed in #1147.
Yup, that's correct. |
What was fixed exactly? I know we are storing rpm md in the commits md now, so maybe that's why? |
What this bug is about: "upgrade --preview does not account for layered packages" :). Not exactly related to the new pkglist metadata. #1147 makes |
@cgwalters - does this comment ^^ still apply considering the updates in #1147? |
I haven't looked how much autoupdates unify the codepaths yet; that was my main issue with it. It's definitely a lot better if we're just fetching one commit object. Hopefully |
That's correct. |
/me assumes that walters is now cool with |
When we run
rpm-ostree upgrade --preview
it shows rpms that we have layered as ones that will be removed with the upgrade. We should probably represent the fact that they are layered packages or add logic to note they won't be removed.the
Updating from: (null)
is also something that i noticed - i've seen it in the past but can't remember where.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: