Skip to content

[Security] Bump rack from 1.6.10 to 1.6.11 #450

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 15, 2019
Merged

[Security] Bump rack from 1.6.10 to 1.6.11 #450

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 15, 2019

Conversation

greysteil
Copy link

Bumps rack from 1.6.10 to 1.6.11. This update includes security fixes.

Vulnerabilities fixed

Sourced from The Ruby Advisory Database.

Possible XSS vulnerability in Rack
There is a possible XSS vulnerability in Rack. Carefully crafted requests can impact the data returned by the scheme method on Rack::Request. Applications that expect the scheme to be limited to "http" or "https" and do not escape the return value could be vulnerable to an XSS attack.

Vulnerable code looks something like this:

<%= request.scheme.html_safe %>

Note that applications using the normal escaping mechanisms provided by Rails may not impacted, but applications that bypass the escaping mechanisms, or do not use them may be vulnerable.

All users running an affected release should either upgrade or use one of the workarounds immediately.

Patched versions: ~> 1.6.11; >= 2.0.6
Unaffected versions: none

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Bumps [rack](https://github.com/rack/rack) from 1.6.10 to 1.6.11. **This update includes security fixes.**
- [Release notes](https://github.com/rack/rack/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/rack/rack/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](rack/rack@1.6.10...1.6.11)

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@dependabot.com>
@sseerrggii sseerrggii merged commit 9d43e2b into coopdevs:develop Feb 15, 2019
@enricostano enricostano mentioned this pull request Feb 18, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants