Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestion : Handle unbounded high-point relaxation #140

Open
hlefebvr opened this issue Jun 21, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Suggestion : Handle unbounded high-point relaxation #140

hlefebvr opened this issue Jun 21, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@hlefebvr
Copy link

Hello,

I am suggesting an enhancement to MibS and will try to motivate this with an example.

Enhancement Handle MILP-MILP Bilevel problems with unbounded high-point relaxation.

Motivation The main motivation comes from the two-stage robust optimization literature and, in particular, the adversarial problem therein, which is a bilevel problem.

Two-stage robust optimization is concerned with general problems of the form

$$ \begin{align} \min_x \ & c^\top x \\ \text{s.t.} \ & x\in X, \\ & \forall \xi\in\Xi, \exists y\in Y(x,\xi). \end{align} $$

Here, $X$ is called the first-stage feasible space, $\Xi$ is the uncertainty set and $Y(x,\xi)$ is the second-stage feasible space.

One traditional method to solve such problems is through column-and-constraint generation. This method considers a finite subset $\lbrace \xi^1, \dotsc, \xi^K \rbrace \subset \Xi$ and solves the relaxation

$$ \begin{align} \min_x \ & c^\top x \\ \text{s.t.} \ & x\in X, \\ & y^k\in Y(x,\xi^k) \qquad k=1,\dotsc,K. \end{align} $$

Then, one needs to check if a (projected) solution to this relaxation, say $\hat x$, is feasible for the original problem. Hence, one needs to search for a $\xi\in \Xi$ such that $Y(x,\xi) = \emptyset$. This can be done by solving a bilevel problem which maximizes newly introduced "artificial" variables in the second stage, i.e., one solves

$$ \begin{align} \max_{\xi\in\Xi} \ & s \\ \text{s.t.} \ & \xi\in\Xi, \\ & y\in\text{arg min}_y { s : y\in Y(x,\xi) + s }. \end{align} $$

Unfortunately, this problem has an unbounded high-point relaxation which makes it unsolvable by MibS.

Hence, in order to be able to use MibS in, e.g., column-and-constraint algorithms as a sub-routine for two-stage robust problem, it would be very nice if MibS could solve such problems.

I am open to discussion on how this can be achieved (included, if needed, contribution to the MibS code).

Thank you,

Henri.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant