You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I found this very weird behavior on one instance that I wanted to share with you.
When I solve the problem with the auxiliary file presenting the follower as maximization (problem.mps paired with followerasMax.aux), I get an output which I am pretty sure is not bilevel feasible.
Now if I solve the same problem but with the auxiliary file presenting the follower as minimization (testProblem.mps paired with followerasMin.aux), then I get an optimal solution to the problem. Now the only difference between the auxiliary files is OS=1 vs OS=-1 and the same exact coefficients but multiplied by (-1).
Could you provide the version of MibS you used to solve the problem?
I tried to solve the problem using the latest version of stable/1.2 and the two different aux files. But I received the same solution below. Could you also help confirm whether these look like what you saw ealier?
I found this very weird behavior on one instance that I wanted to share with you.
When I solve the problem with the auxiliary file presenting the follower as maximization (problem.mps paired with followerasMax.aux), I get an output which I am pretty sure is not bilevel feasible.
Now if I solve the same problem but with the auxiliary file presenting the follower as minimization (testProblem.mps paired with followerasMin.aux), then I get an optimal solution to the problem. Now the only difference between the auxiliary files is OS=1 vs OS=-1 and the same exact coefficients but multiplied by (-1).
Thanks in advance,
Leo
problem.txt
followerasMin.txt
followerasMax.txt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: