QA Report

Low Risk Issues

require() should be used instead of assert()

There are 3 instances of this issue:

https://github.com/PartyDAO/party-contracts-c4/blob/3896577b8f0fa16cba129dc2867aba786b730c1b/contracts/proposals/ProposalExecutionEngine.sol#L142 https://github.com/PartyDAO/party-contracts-c4/blob/3896577b8f0fa16cba129dc2867aba786b730c1b/contracts/proposals/ListOnZoraProposal.sol#L120 https://github.com/PartyDAO/party-contracts-c4/blob/3896577b8f0fa16cba129dc2867aba786b730c1b/contracts/proposals/FractionalizeProposal.sol#L67

Function doesn’t have returns, but return statement declared

There is 1 instance of this issue:

https://github.com/PartyDAO/party-contracts-c4/blob/3896577b8f0fa16cba129dc2867aba786b730c1b/contracts/crowdfund/CrowdfundNFT.sol#L150

Missing checks for address(0x0) when assigning values to address state variables Missing checks for zero-addresses may lead to infunctional protocol, if the variable addresses are updated incorrectly.

There are 5 instances of this issue:

https://github.com/PartyDAO/party-contracts-c4/blob/3896577b8f0fa16cba129dc2867aba786b730c1b/contracts/party/PartyGovernanceNFT.sol#L62 https://github.com/PartyDAO/party-contracts-c4/blob/3896577b8f0fa16cba129dc2867aba786b730c1b/contracts/utils/Proxy.sol#L17 https://github.com/PartyDAO/party-contracts-c4/blob/3896577b8f0fa16cba129dc2867aba786b730c1b/contracts/proposals/FractionalizeProposal.sol#L35 https://github.com/PartyDAO/party-contracts-c4/blob/3896577b8f0fa16cba129dc2867aba786b730c1b/contracts/globals/Globals.sol#L24 https://github.com/PartyDAO/party-contracts-c4/blob/3896577b8f0fa16cba129dc2867aba786b730c1b/contracts/globals/Globals.sol#L28

Non-critical Issues

require()/revert() statements should have descriptive reason strings

There are 2 instances of this issue:

https://github.com/PartyDAO/party-contracts-c4/blob/3896577b8f0fa16cba129dc2867aba786b730c1b/contracts/proposals/ProposalExecutionEngine.sol#L246 https://github.com/PartyDAO/party-contracts-c4/blob/3896577b8f0fa16cba129dc2867aba786b730c1b/contracts/proposals/ProposalExecutionEngine.sol#L247

Unused return variables are confusing Consider changing the variable to be an unnamed one

There are 11 instances of this issue:

https://github.com/PartyDAO/party-contracts-c4/blob/3896577b8f0fa16cba129dc2867aba786b730c1b/contracts/proposals/ProposalExecutionEngine.sol#L107 https://github.com/PartyDAO/party-contracts-c4/blob/3896577b8f0fa16cba129dc2867aba786b730c1b/contracts/proposals/ArbitraryCallsProposal.sol#L41 https://github.com/PartyDAO/party-contracts-c4/blob/3896577b8f0fa16cba129dc2867aba786b730c1b/contracts/crowdfund/AuctionCrowdfund.sol#L199 https://github.com/PartyDAO/party-contracts-c4/blob/3896577b8f0fa16cba129dc2867aba786b730c1b/contracts/crowdfund/AuctionCrowdfund.sol#L287 https://github.com/PartyDAO/party-contracts-c4/blob/3896577b8f0fa16cba129dc2867aba786b730c1b/contracts/proposals/ListOnZoraProposal.sol#L82 https://github.com/PartyDAO/party-contracts-c4/blob/3896577b8f0fa16cba129dc2867aba786b730c1b/contracts/proposals/ListOnZoraProposal.sol#L172 https://github.com/PartyDAO/party-contracts-c4/blob/3896577b8f0fa16cba129dc2867aba786b730c1b/contracts/party/PartyGovernanceNFT.sol#L70 https://github.com/PartyDAO/party-contracts-c4/blob/3896577b8f0fa16cba129dc2867aba786b730c1b/contracts/crowdfund/CrowdfundNFT.sol#L133 https://github.com/PartyDAO/party-contracts-c4/blob/3896577b8f0fa16cba129dc2867aba786b730c1b/contracts/crowdfund/CrowdfundFactory.sol#L113 https://github.com/PartyDAO/party-contracts-c4/blob/3896577b8f0fa16cba129dc2867aba786b730c1b/contracts/proposals/FractionalizeProposal.sol#L43 https://github.com/PartyDAO/party-contracts-c4/blob/3896577b8f0fa16cba129dc2867aba786b730c1b/contracts/proposals/ProposalStorage.sol#L24