`cljr-add-project-dependency` blows up when parsing Clojar artifacts

[andersenleo]

Cross-posting here.

Sorry for skipping the report template - all details should be in the linked Github issue:

syl20bnr/spacemacs#12385

Should also add that I'm running OpenJDK 8 (AdoptOpenJDK).

[benedekfazekas]

thanks for this. although as this comment says the referenced lib's name is somewhat borked. I suppose if the issue can not be reproduced with well named libs I will close this.

[andersenleo]

I understand that approach. At the same time -- if the library was able to be uploaded to Clojars with that format.. wouldn't that indicate that [trident/1.1 "jobryant"] is a valid artifact coordinate and should be "parsable" by refactor-nrepl?

Would it be possible to dump a warning (and ignore) "borked" artifact names when parsing rather than crashing the artifact listing entirely?

[benedekfazekas]

valid point. not sure it worths the effort tho as naming this artifact "1.1" was almost surely not the intention of the author. Happy to look at/accept a PR for this tho.

[andersenleo]

Well - I guess something must be done. The function (which at least I use frequently) is useless until it's either fixed in refactor-nrepl or the library is taken down from Clojars :-)

I'll give the PR a try!

[benedekfazekas]

ah just realised I misunderstood the situation, sorry. This happens when we retrieve version info from clojars so this brakes the feature for everybody. Also as far as I remember clojars is immutable -- altho this is possible a good case for an exception of this rule.

I would also try to raise this with the author of the lib and maybe clojars maintainers. But PR is still very welcome.

[benedekfazekas]

Seems the author got notified already jacobobryant/flub#4

[andersenleo]

Sweet 👍. PR is inbound in a couple of minutes.

[jacobobryant]

Hi. Author of the borked lib here. Yes, I accidentally mixed up the artifact-id and version on that one. Sorry about that. Unfortunately I can't take it down from Clojars since they only delete artifacts when they contain vulnerabilities/private credentials.

[jacobobryant]

FYI, the Clojars docs give the regexes they use to check group/artifact/version here: https://github.com/clojars/clojars-web/wiki/About#what-is-the-legal-format-for-a-group-or-project-name
So I'd recommend updating refactor-nrepl to be in line with that

[andersenleo]

Simple hack to work around the issue in the PR above ☝️.