Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Regression in 4.2.0 related to MethodSignatureComparer #309

Closed
stakx opened this issue Oct 4, 2017 · 7 comments · Fixed by #310
Closed

Regression in 4.2.0 related to MethodSignatureComparer #309

stakx opened this issue Oct 4, 2017 · 7 comments · Fixed by #310
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@stakx
Copy link
Member

stakx commented Oct 4, 2017

@cbruun just reported a regression in Moq (devlooped/moq#469) that looks like it's a regression in Castle Core 4.2.0, caused by #303 (commit 0fe6129).

Repro code:

public interface IBreak
{
	void DoStuff<T>(Implementation1<T> a);
	void DoStuff<T>(Implementation2<T> a);
}

public abstract class BaseType<T> { }
public class Implementation1<T> : BaseType<T> { }
public class Implementation2<T> : BaseType<T> { }

// The following call to `CreateClassProxy` worked in 4.1.1, but throws in 4.2.0:
var generator = new ProxyGenerator();
generator.CreateClassProxy(typeof(object), new[] { typeof(IBreak) } /* , someInterceptor */);
System.TypeLoadException: Method 'DoStuff' in type 'Castle.Proxies.ObjectProxy' from assembly 'DynamicProxyGenAssembly2, Version=0.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null' does not have an implementation.
   at System.Reflection.Emit.TypeBuilder.TermCreateClass(RuntimeModule module, Int32 tk, ObjectHandleOnStack type)
   at System.Reflection.Emit.TypeBuilder.CreateTypeNoLock()
   at System.Reflection.Emit.TypeBuilder.CreateTypeInfo()
   at Castle.DynamicProxy.Generators.Emitters.AbstractTypeEmitter.CreateType(TypeBuilder type)
   at Castle.DynamicProxy.Generators.Emitters.AbstractTypeEmitter.BuildType()
   at Castle.DynamicProxy.Generators.ClassProxyGenerator.GenerateType(String name, Type[] interfaces, INamingScope namingScope)
   at Castle.DynamicProxy.Generators.ClassProxyGenerator.<>c__DisplayClass1_0.<GenerateCode>b__0(String n, INamingScope s)
   at Castle.DynamicProxy.Generators.BaseProxyGenerator.ObtainProxyType(CacheKey cacheKey, Func`3 factory)
   at Castle.DynamicProxy.Generators.ClassProxyGenerator.GenerateCode(Type[] interfaces, ProxyGenerationOptions options)
   at Castle.DynamicProxy.DefaultProxyBuilder.CreateClassProxyType(Type classToProxy, Type[] additionalInterfacesToProxy, ProxyGenerationOptions options)
   at Castle.DynamicProxy.ProxyGenerator.CreateClassProxy(Type classToProxy, Type[] additionalInterfacesToProxy, ProxyGenerationOptions options, Object[] constructorArguments, IInterceptor[] interceptors)
   at Castle.DynamicProxy.ProxyGenerator.CreateClassProxy(Type classToProxy, Type[] additionalInterfacesToProxy, IInterceptor[] interceptors)
   at Program.Main() in …

Probable cause of the regression:

MethodSignatureComparer.EqualSignatureTypes(x: typeof(Implementation1<T>), y: typeof(Implementation2<T>)) no longer returns false. It now returns true because it only checks the type arguments for equality, not the actual generic type definition itself.

Possible solution:

See the PR referenced below.

/cc @BitWizJason

@jonorossi
Copy link
Member

Whoops, that was an oversight. Merged, thanks.

@jonorossi jonorossi added this to the vNext milestone Oct 9, 2017
@BitWizJason
Copy link

Sorry for introducing the bug, at least now there is a test for it. Thanks @stakx !

@jonorossi
Copy link
Member

@stakx would a 4.2.1 release right now with just this fix be welcomed, it sounds like this might affect quite a lot of people.

/cc @fir3pho3nixx

@stakx
Copy link
Member Author

stakx commented Oct 10, 2017

@jonorossi - Such a 4.2.1 release would be much appreciated. 👍 We've just got in another weird report (devlooped/moq#480) that might be related to the same regression (but I can't confirm yet).

I think having a Castle Core 4.2.1 and a Moq 4.7.987 (or whatever our patch version will be, they're admittedly a little strange) would give us some breathing room cause we'd then have no known regressions on the Castle side, and no version conflicts caused on Moq's side, so users would have something reasonably safe to upgrade to.

@jonorossi
Copy link
Member

@stakx 4.2.1 now available: https://github.com/castleproject/Core/releases/tag/v4.2.1

@stakx
Copy link
Member Author

stakx commented Oct 10, 2017

Awesome, thank you very much! 🥇 Will try to get an updated Moq out the door in the next 18 hours. Moq has just been updated to 4.7.142, too.

@thomaslevesque
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the fix; we'll soon release a new version of FakeItEasy as well. FakeItEasy/FakeItEasy#1257

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants