Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add Terraform module for mlflow-server #274

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 27, 2024

Conversation

DnPlas
Copy link
Contributor

@DnPlas DnPlas commented Sep 24, 2024

This PR backports the following Terraform changes from main into track/2.15:

Since the default for deploying the charm is now set to latest/edge in
the re-usable workflow, this is not required anymore
The latest standard for the terraform/ README.md is that the compatibility
note can be obviated since the module at the branch is compatible with the
charm in the same branch.

This commit adds the terraform/ directory to the root of the repository to host
the Terraform module of this charm. This follows the standard set in CC006.
For more information please also refer to canonical/argo-operators/pull/198.

Part of #266

@DnPlas
Copy link
Contributor Author

DnPlas commented Sep 24, 2024

The CI is failing because of issues with the docs, #275 should fix this issue.

terraform/variables.tf Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@DnPlas DnPlas added the backport Backport a change from main into branch label Sep 25, 2024
* feat: add Terraform module for mlflow-server

This commit adds the terraform/ directory to the root of the repository to host
the Terraform module of this charm. This follows the standard set in CC006.
For more information please also refer to canonical/argo-operators/pull/198.

Fixes #266
* ci: remove the channel from terraform checks

Since the default for deploying the charm is now set to latest/edge in
the re-usable workflow, this is not required anymore.

Part of #266

* docs: remove compatibility note

The latest standard for the terraform/ README.md is that the compatibility
note can be obviated since the module at the branch is compatible with the
charm in the same branch.

Part of #266
@DnPlas DnPlas force-pushed the KF-6242-terraform-module-mlflow-server-track branch from a1596ce to 4e99cb5 Compare September 25, 2024 16:26
@DnPlas DnPlas merged commit 0c84767 into track/2.15 Sep 27, 2024
11 checks passed
@DnPlas DnPlas deleted the KF-6242-terraform-module-mlflow-server-track branch September 27, 2024 12:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport Backport a change from main into branch Libraries: Out of sync
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants