Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump the supported Juju version #825

Closed
ca-scribner opened this issue Feb 12, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

Bump the supported Juju version #825

ca-scribner opened this issue Feb 12, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ca-scribner
Copy link
Contributor

Context

Kubeflow 1.8 was released supporting (and tested on) Juju 3.1. 3.1 is near end of life - we need to bump the supported version for future releases (1.9+).

Open questions:

  1. Which version of Juju do we target?
  2. Do we also backport support to Charmed Kubeflow 1.8?
  3. Should our CI support exactly one version of Juju, or should we support a matrix?
    a. Maybe repo CI supports a specific version, while bundle integration tests support a matrix?

What needs to get done

  1. Decide all open questions and add additional DoD/tasks as appropriate
  2. Test and release Charmed Kubeflow 1.9 for an appropriate Juju version

Definition of Done

  1. Charmed Kubeflow 1.9 released and tested for an appropriate Juju version
@ca-scribner ca-scribner added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 12, 2024
Copy link

Thank you for reporting us your feedback!

The internal ticket has been created: https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/KF-5338.

This message was autogenerated

@nishant-dash
Copy link

Just wanted to add that if you do target a single version of juju at a time rather than a matrix of releases, it would make sense to me that LTS versions of juju are targeted

@ca-scribner
Copy link
Contributor Author

agreed! I think when we implement this should be just after 3.5 is released, so that'll work out perfectly

@DnPlas
Copy link
Contributor

DnPlas commented Jun 26, 2024

Closing as we are tracking this effort in #944

@DnPlas DnPlas closed this as completed Jun 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants