Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CAM-13629: enable quarkus application.properties for the process engine config #1582

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 19, 2021

Conversation

koevskinikola
Copy link
Member

  • Allow for the process engine to be configured through an applicaton.properties file using a generic properties map which is applied to the QuarkusProcessEngineConfiguration instance through reflection.

Related to CAM-13629

@koevskinikola koevskinikola requested a review from tasso94 August 18, 2021 15:24
@koevskinikola koevskinikola self-assigned this Aug 18, 2021
Copy link
Member

@tasso94 tasso94 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me in general. Can we add the following test scenarios:

  • Mixed programmatic and application.properties based configuration.
  • Mixed process engine, job executor, and Quarkus Extension specific (datasource) configuration.

Additionally, see comments below.

Base automatically changed from CAM-13811-quarkus-camunda-thread-pool to master August 19, 2021 07:05
* Allow for the process engine to be configured through an applicaton.properties file using a generic properties map which is applied to the QuarkusProcessEngineConfiguration instance through reflection.

Related to CAM-13629
@koevskinikola koevskinikola force-pushed the CAM-13629-quarkus-config-props branch from ce3dfc0 to ab299aa Compare August 19, 2021 07:27
@koevskinikola koevskinikola requested a review from tasso94 August 19, 2021 07:32
@koevskinikola koevskinikola merged commit a0a1dd7 into master Aug 19, 2021
@koevskinikola koevskinikola deleted the CAM-13629-quarkus-config-props branch August 19, 2021 12:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants