Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: Allow alternative to camunda-7-adapter #264

Closed
ManuelDittmar opened this issue May 2, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #276
Closed

Feature request: Allow alternative to camunda-7-adapter #264

ManuelDittmar opened this issue May 2, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #276
Labels

Comments

@ManuelDittmar
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Currently if I want to migrate my diagram, it will automatically set the task type to camunda-7-adapter and Header delegateExpression. If I would prefer to refactor everything instead of using the adapter, I need to either migrate manually or remove all the headers and change the type.

Describe the solution you'd like

Use a flag e.g. use c7-adpater.
If yes > add header + type
If no > warning + no type definition

Describe alternatives you've considered

Additional context

@ManuelDittmar ManuelDittmar added the enhancement New feature or request label May 2, 2023
@ingorichtsmeier
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ManuelDittmar,

the command line converter supports a different name for the task type: https://github.com/camunda-community-hub/camunda-7-to-8-migration/tree/main/backend-diagram-converter/cli#convert-diagrams-from-the-local-file-systems

--adapter-job-type=<adapterJobType>

Usually, it is OK to start the migration journey with a single task type and set up your environment with a single "log-only" worker. Then you can add workers one by one and change the task types until all is migrated.

If you don't set any task type, the diagram cannot be deployed until all service tasks are changed manually. It depends on the size of the model if this OK or not.

@ManuelDittmar
Copy link
Author

Hi @ingorichtsmeier,
thanks for the explanation.
that helps for setting the job type, however it will still create the delegateExpression header.
If I want to refactor my application and not use the c7-adapter this is not needed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
3 participants