We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~bajel3am/gpcomparison2017/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The following paper describes the details of uncertainty criterion.
http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~bajel3am/img/pitra2016doubly_preprint.pdf
There are 4 types of uncertainty criteria.
The most simple approach which just uses the variance of the first model performs the best.
This and all the following experiments use the criterion Cs^2 which performed best in the first set of experiments
Sorry, something went wrong.
In this paper, they use IPOP-CMA-ES. I implemented it at #131.
No branches or pull requests
http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~bajel3am/gpcomparison2017/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: