You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I calculated partition heritability for ATAC seq peaks by using 106 GWAS sumstats.
For example: for "PASS.Schizophrenia.Trubetskoy2022 GWAS sumstats", I have 98 categories for peaks. I selected only category "L2_1" as partition heritability output for my peak list: Here is the output:
Category Prop._SNPs Prop.h2 Prop. h2_std_error
L2_1 3.388603e-05 0.0002310644 0.0009682196
Enrichment Enrichment_std_error Enrichment_p
6.818871 28.57283 0.8386025
Coefficient Coefficient_std_error Coefficient_z.score
8.627471e-07 3.927119e-06 0.2196896
Now I have 106 results for my peak list, which corresponds to 106 GWAS traits.
How can I select significant enriched GWAS traits in my peak list?
Which one is appropriate: calculate q value based on Enrichment_p value and filter based on q < 0.05 or consider Coefficient_z_score and calculate p and q value, then filter q < 0.05. Can you please suggest me? If I use approach 1, none of the GWAS traits will be significant in my list.
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@reshu23 For the purposes of determining whether each trait is enriched in a given annotation, one should use the enrichment p-value. (This is different from Finucane et al. 2015, who tried to determine whether each annotation is enriched in a given trait.)
Your peak list does not cover a large enough proportion of genome to accurately estimate the coefficient or the enrichment z-score, so I am not surprised that no trait comes out with significant enrichment at FDR 0.05.
Dear Team,
I calculated partition heritability for ATAC seq peaks by using 106 GWAS sumstats.
For example: for "PASS.Schizophrenia.Trubetskoy2022 GWAS sumstats", I have 98 categories for peaks. I selected only category "L2_1" as partition heritability output for my peak list: Here is the output:
Category Prop._SNPs Prop.h2 Prop. h2_std_error
L2_1 3.388603e-05 0.0002310644 0.0009682196
Enrichment Enrichment_std_error Enrichment_p
6.818871 28.57283 0.8386025
Coefficient Coefficient_std_error Coefficient_z.score
8.627471e-07 3.927119e-06 0.2196896
Now I have 106 results for my peak list, which corresponds to 106 GWAS traits.
How can I select significant enriched GWAS traits in my peak list?
Which one is appropriate: calculate q value based on Enrichment_p value and filter based on q < 0.05 or consider Coefficient_z_score and calculate p and q value, then filter q < 0.05. Can you please suggest me? If I use approach 1, none of the GWAS traits will be significant in my list.
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: