Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

smoove/paste + singularty + 1185 vcfs: argument list too long #151

Closed
lindenb opened this issue May 14, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

smoove/paste + singularty + 1185 vcfs: argument list too long #151

lindenb opened this issue May 14, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@lindenb
Copy link
Contributor

lindenb commented May 14, 2021

Hi @brentp

I'm trying to use smoove/paste with singularity and 1185 bams. I got an error

argument list too long

it's not clear to me if the problem comes from bash/singularity/smoove.

  1. is it possible to use a divide-and-conquer strategy with paste ? : paste vcfs 1-100, paste vcfs 101-200, paste vcfs 201-300, etc... and then paste the merged vcfs ?

  2. Am I wrong ? smoove doesn't support a .list extension like you did here : `Argument list too long' on 30k samples somalier#37 (comment) ?

thank you again for your help :-)

@lindenb
Copy link
Contributor Author

lindenb commented May 14, 2021

answering my own question: using a divide-and-conquer strategy worked. (however I'm not sure if the INFO fields were correctly merged).

@lindenb lindenb closed this as completed May 14, 2021
@brentp
Copy link
Owner

brentp commented May 14, 2021

Hi Pierre, yes, I should add support for a .list argument here. Would love to get a PR to that effect. Otherwise, I'll leave this open til I have a chance to implement.

@brentp brentp reopened this May 14, 2021
@brentp brentp closed this as completed in 09595b1 May 18, 2021
@brentp
Copy link
Owner

brentp commented May 19, 2021

Hi Pierre, I wonder if using bcftools merge with -m none makes it faster?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants