Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

would you like to join digitizing tools #1

Open
bstroebl opened this issue Feb 6, 2014 · 2 comments
Open

would you like to join digitizing tools #1

bstroebl opened this issue Feb 6, 2014 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@bstroebl
Copy link

bstroebl commented Feb 6, 2014

Hi Radim,
about half a year ago I started DigitzingTools https://github.com/bstroebl/DigitizingTools as a common effort to subsume all related with digitizing into one plugin, rather than having the functionality in scattered plugins.
I would be happy if you joined this effort.
Bernhard

@blazek
Copy link
Owner

blazek commented Dec 9, 2014

I also prefer single plugin for this kind of things, that is why I also contributed the spline tool to CADTools, but I was not much convinced by CADTools interface, that is why I also made this standalone version.
And there are many others: CADDIgitize, CADInput,.... difficult to decide which is that one plugin all should go into.

Are your DigitizingTools substituted by qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals#8 ?

@blazek blazek added the question label Dec 9, 2014
@bstroebl
Copy link
Author

  • cadTools: I agree with you, cadTools interface is not very intuitive. Therefore I put a lot of effort in my part of DigitizingTools' UI.
  • Single plugin: We had a discussion on the mailing list and for me (I am responsible for GIS and CAD in my institution) there are tools that are CAD and tools that are not. CAD is about constructing things or digitizing with coordinates or angles. DigitizingTools is functions that come in handy in general digitizing. I would not call the standard digitize-polygon tool a CAD tool either.
  • QEP#8: I am aware of QEP#8 and would certainly try to use the new classes in DigitizingTools once they are accessible from Python. AFAIU DigitizingTools is not substituted by QEP#8 because the tools are not covered by it nor by cadTools.
  • #5342 proposes to move DigitizingTools into core but I did not do anything about that for the time being. I am not a C++ programmer so I cannot port the tools myself. But I do support the idea. Maybe this should be tackled when QEP#8 is into core and DigitizingTools would need a relaunch anyways.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants