BIP112: fix example #427
Merged
BIP112: fix example #427
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
Member
|
Personally, I think it's preferable to use the VERIFY... |
Contributor
Author
|
@luke-jr , technically you could do that, which requires an extra push in scriptSig |
Member
|
Why would it need an extra push? AFAIK, OP_CHECK[MULTI]SIGVERIFY behaves exactly as OP_CHECK[MULTI]SIG except that the VERIFY variant short-circuits script execution immediately. |
Contributor
Author
|
Without an extra push the stack will be empty after evaluation, which is invalid |
Contributor
Contributor
|
utACK Though I'd suggest jl2012 take my advice. :) |
Contributor
|
ACK |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
CHECK(MULTI)SIG should be used.