Skip to content

Revert "qt: Do not use QObject::tr plural syntax for numbers with a unit symbol" #557

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 3, 2022

Conversation

luke-jr
Copy link
Member

@luke-jr luke-jr commented Feb 22, 2022

Apparently this got forgotten. Maybe too late for 23.x (it's a bugfix, but changes translation strings).

This reverts commit 3adde72 (#296)

per GChuf

I can confirm for slovenian and other slavic languages that we do have 3 or 4 different ways of saying "%n GB needed%, depending on the actual number of gigabytes. Similar to english "is/are". There's no way to cover all cases ... this is exactly why transifex allows you to have more than 2 options.

Copy link
Member

@hebasto hebasto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK 0c64401, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.

Languages indeed are so different.

@hebasto hebasto merged commit 31b1c67 into bitcoin-core:master Apr 3, 2022
sidhujag pushed a commit to syscoin/syscoin that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2022
… syntax for numbers with a unit symbol"

0c64401 Revert "qt: Do not use QObject::tr plural syntax for numbers with a unit symbol" (Luke Dashjr)

Pull request description:

  Apparently this got forgotten. Maybe too late for 23.x (it's a bugfix, but changes translation strings).

  This reverts commit 3adde72 (#296)

  per [GChuf](bitcoin-core/gui#296 (comment))

  >I can confirm for slovenian and other slavic languages that we do have 3 or 4 different ways of saying "%n GB needed%, depending on the actual number of gigabytes. Similar to english "is/are". There's no way to cover all cases ... this is exactly why transifex allows you to have more than 2 options.

ACKs for top commit:
  hebasto:
    ACK 0c64401, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.

Tree-SHA512: c01bae44a32b3ec324f2f9b8e4923bbb2e83bbd1460b745c5c911b98a9b2806fcbf815cfb19a1f1a7038c5c14312e102e7df8744c9002ef784b36d158e08eb14
@bitcoin-core bitcoin-core locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 17, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants