Skip to content

Conversation

@taktv6
Copy link
Member

@taktv6 taktv6 commented May 5, 2020

No description provided.

@taktv6 taktv6 requested a review from hikhvar May 5, 2020 17:08
@hikhvar
Copy link

hikhvar commented May 6, 2020

I don't have any write acces to this Repo. However LGTM.

@moepman
Copy link

moepman commented May 8, 2020

I can confirm that with these changes sFlow data that contains "Expanded Flow Samples" can be parsed. Only thing to note would be that some fields are ignored, which means that if some other agent implementation were to use something else then 0 for those "type" fields the interpretation of the following fields is probably incorrect. But as far as I can tell the worst case of that would be wrong interface names.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants