From d65f3767de20782e75d8a665fdc54f822f344802 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Leon Hwang Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 22:53:51 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] bpf: Fix tailcall cases in test_bpf Since f663a03c8e35 ("bpf, x64: Remove tail call detection"), tail_call_reachable won't be detected in x86 JIT. And, tail_call_reachable is provided by verifier. Therefore, in test_bpf, the tail_call_reachable must be provided in test cases before running. Fix and test: [ 174.828662] test_bpf: #0 Tail call leaf jited:1 170 PASS [ 174.829574] test_bpf: #1 Tail call 2 jited:1 244 PASS [ 174.830363] test_bpf: #2 Tail call 3 jited:1 296 PASS [ 174.830924] test_bpf: #3 Tail call 4 jited:1 719 PASS [ 174.831863] test_bpf: #4 Tail call load/store leaf jited:1 197 PASS [ 174.832240] test_bpf: #5 Tail call load/store jited:1 326 PASS [ 174.832240] test_bpf: #6 Tail call error path, max count reached jited:1 2214 PASS [ 174.835713] test_bpf: #7 Tail call count preserved across function calls jited:1 609751 PASS [ 175.446098] test_bpf: #8 Tail call error path, NULL target jited:1 472 PASS [ 175.447597] test_bpf: #9 Tail call error path, index out of range jited:1 206 PASS [ 175.448833] test_bpf: test_tail_calls: Summary: 10 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [10/10 JIT'ed] Reported-by: kernel test robot Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202406251415.c51865bc-oliver.sang@intel.com Fixes: f663a03c8e35 ("bpf, x64: Remove tail call detection") Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240625145351.40072-1-hffilwlqm@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- lib/test_bpf.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c index ce5716c3999a47..b7acc29bcc3be0 100644 --- a/lib/test_bpf.c +++ b/lib/test_bpf.c @@ -15198,6 +15198,7 @@ struct tail_call_test { int flags; int result; int stack_depth; + bool has_tail_call; }; /* Flags that can be passed to tail call test cases */ @@ -15273,6 +15274,7 @@ static struct tail_call_test tail_call_tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = 3, + .has_tail_call = true, }, { "Tail call 3", @@ -15283,6 +15285,7 @@ static struct tail_call_test tail_call_tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = 6, + .has_tail_call = true, }, { "Tail call 4", @@ -15293,6 +15296,7 @@ static struct tail_call_test tail_call_tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = 10, + .has_tail_call = true, }, { "Tail call load/store leaf", @@ -15323,6 +15327,7 @@ static struct tail_call_test tail_call_tests[] = { }, .result = 0, .stack_depth = 16, + .has_tail_call = true, }, { "Tail call error path, max count reached", @@ -15335,6 +15340,7 @@ static struct tail_call_test tail_call_tests[] = { }, .flags = FLAG_NEED_STATE | FLAG_RESULT_IN_STATE, .result = (MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT + 1) * MAX_TESTRUNS, + .has_tail_call = true, }, { "Tail call count preserved across function calls", @@ -15357,6 +15363,7 @@ static struct tail_call_test tail_call_tests[] = { .stack_depth = 8, .flags = FLAG_NEED_STATE | FLAG_RESULT_IN_STATE, .result = (MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT + 1) * MAX_TESTRUNS, + .has_tail_call = true, }, { "Tail call error path, NULL target", @@ -15369,6 +15376,7 @@ static struct tail_call_test tail_call_tests[] = { }, .flags = FLAG_NEED_STATE | FLAG_RESULT_IN_STATE, .result = MAX_TESTRUNS, + .has_tail_call = true, }, { "Tail call error path, index out of range", @@ -15381,6 +15389,7 @@ static struct tail_call_test tail_call_tests[] = { }, .flags = FLAG_NEED_STATE | FLAG_RESULT_IN_STATE, .result = MAX_TESTRUNS, + .has_tail_call = true, }, }; @@ -15430,6 +15439,7 @@ static __init int prepare_tail_call_tests(struct bpf_array **pprogs) fp->len = len; fp->type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER; fp->aux->stack_depth = test->stack_depth; + fp->aux->tail_call_reachable = test->has_tail_call; memcpy(fp->insnsi, test->insns, len * sizeof(struct bpf_insn)); /* Relocate runtime tail call offsets and addresses */