Skip to content

docs(state-transition): fix validator lifecycle README typos#3146

Open
weifanglab wants to merge 1 commit into
berachain:mainfrom
weifanglab:docs-state-transition-typos
Open

docs(state-transition): fix validator lifecycle README typos#3146
weifanglab wants to merge 1 commit into
berachain:mainfrom
weifanglab:docs-state-transition-typos

Conversation

@weifanglab

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Fixes several typos and small wording issues in the state transition core README.

This also updates the validator handling section from "two notable exceptions" to "three notable exceptions" to match the three bullets listed below it.

Signed-off-by: weifanglab <weifanglab@outlook.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 13, 2026 16:14
@weifanglab
weifanglab requested a review from a team as a code owner July 13, 2026 16:14

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR polishes the state-transition/core documentation by correcting typos and tightening wording in the validator lifecycle/state transition README to better match actual behavior and improve readability.

Changes:

  • Fixes multiple spelling/grammar issues across validator balance and lifecycle sections.
  • Updates the “notable exceptions” count to match the number of bullets listed.
  • Minor phrasing improvements for clarity in validator activation/eviction descriptions.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread state-transition/core/README.md
Comment thread state-transition/core/README.md
@weifanglab

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@calbera @bar-bera Hi, Could you please review this PR at your convenience? Thank you very much.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants