This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 27, 2022. It is now read-only.
Some ideas about possible adjunct hyperservices for consideration #1898
Unanswered
liquidstars
asked this question in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
-
Sorry if this is a lot all at once but I had some time to think about this today and wanted to put it all together in one spot since many aspects overlap and interrelate. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
First, your project looks very thoughtful and significant. I wish to contribute to building Web 3.0 and your project looks like it is heading in a good direction to those ends. I had looked at IPFS but the design/build OSI layer is lower than I would like to work in. Hope that makes sense. I would like to use Beaker and its Hyper components for building persistent web presence for content, free from censorship and other such impediments.
When looking at IPFS I had a number of questions. How does the universe not become flooded with junk, which could well be deliberate. How are incentives arrange for people to contribute and maintain resources to support/grow the network. and other similar considerations. There is much that pertains to the social and behavioral activities of people, beyond the technology layer.
Here are a few thoughts, for your consideration. Thinking ahead about some of these items in an architectural sense may be of benefit for fitting in adjunct, supportive services in the future:
Suggesstions for adjunct Hyper Services to increase participation and provisioning, reduce vulnerability to abuse/flooding
Liquidstars 2021-01-15
Hyper-Services:
peer based adjunct services running as independent processes on peer devices to support searching, storage, anonymity, payment for provisioning, using Beaker Browser as services control panel
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions