aquery.html

---
layout: documentation
title: Aquery (action graph query)
---
<h1>Action Graph Query (aquery)</h1>


<p>
  The <code>aquery</code> command allows you to query for actions in your build graph.
  It operates on the post-analysis Configured Target Graph and exposes
  information about <b>Actions, Artifacts and their relationships.</b>
</p>

<p>
  <code>aquery</code> is useful when you are interested in the properties of the Actions/Artifacts
  generated from the Configured Target Graph. For example, the actual commands run
  and their inputs/outputs/mnemonics.
</p>

<p>
  The tool accepts several command-line <a href="#aquery-options">options</a>.
  Notably, the aquery command runs on top of a regular Bazel build and inherits
  the set of options available during a build.
</p>

<p>
  It supports the same set of functions that is also available to traditional
  <code>query</code> but <code>siblings</code>, <code>buildfiles</code> and
  <code>tests</code>.
</p>

<p>An example <code>aquery</code> output (without specific details):</p>

<pre>
$ bazel aquery 'deps(//some:label)'
action 'Writing file some_file_name'
  Mnemonic: ...
  Target: ...
  Configuration: ...
  ActionKey: ...
  Inputs: [...]
  Outputs: [...]
</pre>

<h2 id='basic-syntax'>Basic syntax</h2>

<p>A simple example of the syntax for <code>aquery</code> is as follows:</p>

<p><code>bazel aquery "aquery_function(function(//target))"</code></p>

<p>The query expression (in quotes) consists of the following:

<ul>
  <li>
    <code>aquery_function(...)</code>: functions specific to <code>aquery</code>.
    More details <a href="#functions">below</a>.
  </li>
  <li>
    <code>function(...)</code>: the standard <a href="query.html#functions">functions</a>
    as traditional <code>query</code>.
  </li>
  <li>
    <code>//target</code> is the label to the interested target.
   </li>
</ul>

<pre>
# aquery examples:
# Get the action graph generated while building //src/target_a
$ bazel aquery '//src/target_a'

# Get the action graph generated while building all dependencies of //src/target_a
$ bazel aquery 'deps(//src/target_a)'

# Get the action graph generated while building all dependencies of //src/target_a
# whose inputs filenames match the regex ".*cpp".
$ bazel aquery 'inputs(".*cpp", deps(//src/target_a))'
</pre>

<h2 id='functions'>Using aquery functions</h2>

<p>There are three <code>aquery</code> functions:</p>
<ul>
  <li><code>inputs</code>: filter actions by inputs.</li>
  <li><code>outputs</code>: filter actions by outputs</li>
  <li><code>mnemonic</code>: filter actions by mnemonic</li>
</ul>

<p><code>expr ::= inputs(word, expr)</code></p>

<p>
  The <code>inputs</code> operator returns the actions generated from building <code>expr</code>,
  whose input filenames match the regex provided by <code>word</code>.
</p>

<p><code>$ bazel aquery 'inputs(".*cpp", deps(//src/target_a))'</code></p>

<p><code>outputs</code> and <code>mnemonic</code> functions share a similar syntax.</p>

<p>You can also combine functions to achieve the AND operation. For example:</p>
<pre>
  $ bazel aquery 'mnemonic("Cpp.*", (inputs(".*cpp", inputs("foo.*", //src/target_a))))'
</pre>
<p>
  The above command would find all actions involved in building <code>//src/target_a</code>,
  whose mnemonics match <code>"Cpp.*"</code> and inputs match the patterns
  <code>".*cpp"</code> and <code>"foo.*"</code>.
</p>

<h3>Important: aquery functions can't be nested inside non-aquery functions</h3>
<ul>
  <li>Conceptually this makes sense since the output of aquery functions is Actions,
    not Configured Targets.</li>
  <li>
    An example of the syntax error produced:
    <pre>
        $ bazel aquery 'deps(inputs(".*cpp", //src/target_a))'
        ERROR: aquery filter functions (inputs, outputs, mnemonic) produce actions,
        and therefore can't be the input of other function types: deps
        deps(inputs(".*cpp", //src/target_a))
      </pre>
  </li>
</ul>

<h2 id='options'>Options</h2>

<h3>Build options</h3>

<p>
  <code>aquery</code> runs on top of a regular Bazel build and thus inherits the set of
  <a href="command-line-reference.html#build-options">options</a>
  available during a build.
</p>

<h3 id="aquery-options">Aquery options</h3>

<h4><code class='flag'>--output=(text|proto|textproto|jsonproto), default=text</code></h4>

<p>
  The default output format (<code>text</code>) is human-readable,
  use <code>proto</code>, <code>textproto</code>, or <code>jsonproto</code> for machine-readable format.
  The proto message is <code>analysis.ActionGraphContainer</code>.
</p>

<h4><code class='flag'>--include_commandline, default=true</code></h4>

<p>
  Includes the content of the action command lines in the output (potentially large).
</p>

<h4><code class='flag'>--include_artifacts, default=true</code></h4>

<p>
  Includes names of the action inputs and outputs in the output (potentially large).
</p>

<h4><code class='flag'>--include_aspects, default=true</code></h4>

<p>
  Whether to include Aspect-generated actions in the output.
</p>

<h4><code class='flag'>--include_param_files, default=false</code></h4>

<p>
  Include the content of the param files used in the command (potentially large).
  Warning: Enabling this flag will automatically enable the <code>--include_commandline</code> flag.
</p>

<h4><code class='flag'>--skyframe_state, default=false</code></h4>

<p>
  Without performing extra analysis, dump the Action Graph from Skyframe.
  Note: Specifying a target with <code>--skyframe_state</code> is currently not supported.
  This flag is only available with <code>--output=proto</code> or <code>--output=textproto</code>.
</p>

<h2 id='misc'>Other tools and features</h2>

<h3 id="skyframe-state">Querying against the state of Skyframe</h3>

<p>
  <a href="https://bazel.build/designs/skyframe.html">Skyframe</a> is the evaluation and
  incrementality model of Bazel. On each instance of Bazel server, Skyframe stores the dependency graph
  constructed from the previous runs of the <a href="guide.html#analysis-phase">Analysis phase</a>.
</p>

<p>
  In some cases, it is useful to query the Action Graph on Skyframe.
  An example use case would be:
</p>

<ol>
  <li>Run <code>bazel build //target_a</code></li>
  <li>Run <code>bazel build //target_b</code></li>
  <li>File <code>foo.out</code> was generated.</li>
</ol>

<p>
  <i>As a Bazel user, I want to determine if <code>foo.out</code> was generated from building
  <code>//target_a</code> or <code>//target_b</code></i>.
</p>

<p>
  One could run <code>bazel aquery 'outputs("foo.out", //target_a)'</code> and
  <code>bazel aquery 'outputs("foo.out", //target_b)'</code> to figure out the action responsible
  for creating <code>foo.out</code>, and in turn the target. However, the number of different
  targets previously built can be larger than 2, which makes running multiple <code>aquery</code>
  commands a hassle.
</p>

<p>As an alternative, the <code>--skyframe_state</code> flag can be used:</p>

<pre>
  # List all actions on Skyframe's action graph
  $ bazel aquery --output=proto --skyframe_state

  # or

  # List all actions on Skyframe's action graph, whose output matches "foo.out"
  $ bazel aquery --output=proto --skyframe_state 'outputs("foo.out")'
</pre>

<p>
  With <code>--skyframe_state</code> mode, <code>aquery</code> takes the content of the Action Graph
  that Skyframe keeps on the instance of Bazel, (optionally) performs filtering on it and
  outputs the content, without re-running the analysis phase.
</p>

<h4>Special considerations</h4>

<h5>Output format</h5>

<p><code>--skyframe_state</code> is currently only available for <code>--output=proto</code>
  and <code>--output=textproto</code></p>

<h5>Non-inclusion of target labels in the query expression</h5>

<p>
  Currently, <code>--skyframe_state</code> queries the whole action graph that exists on Skyframe,
  regardless of the targets. Having the target label specified in the query together with
  <code>--skyframe_state</code> is considered a syntax error:
</p>

<pre>
  # WRONG: Target Included
  $ bazel aquery --output=proto --skyframe_state <b>//target_a</b>
  ERROR: Error while parsing '//target_a)': Specifying build target(s) [//target_a] with --skyframe_state is currently not supported.

  # WRONG: Target Included
  $ bazel aquery --output=proto --skyframe_state 'inputs(".*.java", <b>//target_a</b>)'
  ERROR: Error while parsing '//target_a)': Specifying build target(s) [//target_a] with --skyframe_state is currently not supported.

  # CORRECT: Without Target
  $ bazel aquery --output=proto --skyframe_state
  $ bazel aquery --output=proto --skyframe_state 'inputs(".*.java")'
</pre>

<h3 id="diff-tool">Comparing aquery outputs</h3>

<p>
  You can compare the outputs of two different aquery invocations using the <code>aquery_differ</code> tool.
  For instance: when you make some changes to your rule definition and want to verify that the
  command lines being run did not change. <code>aquery_differ</code> is the tool for that.
</p>

<p>
  The tool is available in the <a href="https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/tree/master/tools/aquery_differ">bazelbuild/bazel</a> repository.
  To use it, clone the repository to your local machine. An example usage:
</p>


<pre>
  $ bazel run //tools/aquery_differ -- \
  --before=/path/to/before.proto \
  --after=/path/to/after.proto \
  --input_type=proto \
  --attrs=cmdline \
  --attrs=inputs
</pre>


<p>
  The above command returns the difference between the <code>before</code> and <code>after</code> aquery outputs:
  which actions were present in one but not the other, which actions have different
  command line/inputs in each aquery output, ...). The result of running the above command would be:
</p>

<pre>
  Aquery output 'after' change contains an action that generates the following outputs that aquery output 'before' change doesn't:
  ...
  /list of output files/
  ...

  [cmdline]
  Difference in the action that generates the following output(s):
    /path/to/abc.out
  --- /path/to/before.proto
  +++ /path/to/after.proto
  @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
    ...
    /cmdline diff, in unified diff format/
    ...
</pre>

<h4>Command options</h4>
<p><code class='flag'>--before, --after</code>: The aquery output files to be compared</p>
<p>
  <code class='flag'>--input_type=(proto|text_proto), default=proto</code>: the format of the input
  files. Support is provided for <code>proto</code> and <code>textproto</code> aquery output.
</p>
<p>
  <code class='flag'>--attrs=(cmdline|inputs), default=cmdline</code>: the attributes of actions
  to be compared.
</p>

<h3 id="aspect-on-aspect">Aspect-on-aspect</h3>

<p>
  It is possible for <a href="https://docs.bazel.build/versions/main/skylark/aspects.html">Aspects</a>
  to be applied on top of each other. The aquery output of the action generated by these Aspects would
  then include the <i>Aspect path</i>, which is the sequence of Aspects applied to the target which generated the action.
</p>

<p>An example of Aspect-on-Aspect:</p>

<pre>
  t0
  ^
  | <- a1
  t1
  ^
  | <- a2
  t2
</pre>

<p>
  Let t<sub>i</sub> be a target of rule r<sub>i</sub>, which applies an Aspect a<sub>i</sub>
  to its dependencies.
</p>

<p>Assume that a2 generates an action X when applied to target t0. The text output of
  <code>bazel aquery --include_aspects 'deps(//t2)'</code> for action X would be:</p>

<pre>
  action ...
  Mnemonic: ...
  Target: //my_pkg:t0
  Configuration: ...
  AspectDescriptors: [//my_pkg:rule.bzl%<b>a2</b>(foo=...)
    -> //my_pkg:rule.bzl%<b>a1</b>(bar=...)]
  ...
</pre>

<p>
  This means that action <code>X</code> was generated by Aspect <code>a2</code> applied onto
  <code>a1(t0)</code>, where <code>a1(t0)</code> is the result of Aspect <code>a1</code> applied
  onto target <code>t0</code>.
</p>

<p>Each <code>AspectDescriptor</code> has the following format:</p>

<pre>
  AspectClass([param=value,...])
</pre>

<p>
  <code>AspectClass</code> could be the name of the Aspect class (for native Aspects) or
  <code>bzl_file%aspect_name</code> (for Starlark Aspects). <code>AspectDescriptor</code> are
  sorted in topological order of the
  <a href="https://docs.bazel.build/versions/main/skylark/aspects.html#aspect-basics">dependency graph</a>.
</p>

<h3 id="linking-json-profile">Linking with the JSON profile</h3>
<p>
  While aquery provides information about the actions being run in a build (why they're being run,
  their inputs/outputs), the <a href="https://docs.bazel.build/versions/main/skylark/performance.html#performance-profiling">JSON profile</a>
  tells us the timing and duration of their execution.
  It is possible to combine these 2 sets of information via a common denominator: an action's primary output.
</p>

<p>
  To include actions' outputs in the JSON profile, generate the profile with
  <code>--experimental_include_primary_output --noexperimental_slim_json_profile</code>.
  Slim profiles are incompatible with the inclusion of primary outputs. An action's primary output
  is included by default by aquery.
</p>

<p>
  We don't currently provide a canonical tool to combine these 2 data sources, but you should be
  able to build your own script with the above information.
</p>

<h2 id='known-issues'>Known issues</h2>

<h3 id='shared-actions'>Handling shared actions</h3>

<p>
  Sometimes actions are
  <a href="https://source.bazel.build/bazel/+/master:src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/actions/Actions.java;l=59;drc=146d51aa1ec9dcb721a7483479ef0b1ac21d39f1">shared</a>
  between configured targets.

  In the execution phase, those shared actions are
  <a href="https://source.bazel.build/bazel/+/master:src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/actions/Actions.java;l=241;drc=003b8734036a07b496012730964ac220f486b61f">simply considered as one</a> and only executed once.
  However, aquery operates on the pre-execution, post-analysis action graph, and hence treats these
  like separate actions whose output Artifacts have the exact same <code>execPath</code>. As a result,
  equivalent Artifacts appear duplicated.
</p>
<p>
  The list of aquery issues/planned features can be found on
  <a href="https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/labels/team-Performance">GitHub</a>.
</p>
<h2 id='faqs'>FAQs</h2>

<h3 id='action-key'>The ActionKey remains the same even though the content of an input file changed.</h3>


<p>
  In the context of aquery, the <code>ActionKey</code> refers to the <code>String</code> gotten from
  <code><a href="https://cs.opensource.google/bazel/bazel/+/master:src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/actions/ActionAnalysisMetadata.java;l=89;drc=8b856f5484f0117b2aebc302f849c2a15f273310">ActionAnalysisMetadata#getKey</a></code>:
</p>

<pre>
  Returns a string encoding all of the significant behaviour of this Action that might affect the
  output. The general contract of <code>getKey</code> is this: if the work to be performed by the
  execution of this action changes, the key must change.

  ...

  Examples of changes that should affect the key are:

  - Changes to the BUILD file that materially affect the rule which gave rise to this Action.
  - Changes to the command-line options, environment, or other global configuration resources
      which affect the behaviour of this kind of Action (other than changes to the names of the
      input/output files, which are handled externally).
  - An upgrade to the build tools which changes the program logic of this kind of Action
      (typically this is achieved by incorporating a UUID into the key, which is changed each
      time the program logic of this action changes).
  Note the following exception: for actions that discover inputs, the key must change if any
  input names change or else action validation may falsely validate.
</pre>

<p>
  This excludes the changes to the content of the input files, and is not to be confused with
  <code><a href="https://cs.opensource.google/bazel/bazel/+/master:src/main/java/com/google/devtools/build/lib/remote/common/RemoteCacheClient.java;l=38;drc=21577f202eb90ce94a337ebd2ede824d609537b6">RemoteCacheClient#ActionKey</a></code>.
</p>

<h2 id='updates'>Updates</h2>

<p>
  Please contact twerth@google.com and leba@google.com for any issue/feature request.
</p>