Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Waterline createEach() modify the input array #6862

Open
lucafaggianelli opened this issue Sep 19, 2019 · 5 comments
Open

Waterline createEach() modify the input array #6862

lucafaggianelli opened this issue Sep 19, 2019 · 5 comments
Labels
helpful info or workaround needs documentation orm Related to models, datastores, orm config, Waterline, sails-hook-orm, etc.

Comments

@lucafaggianelli
Copy link

lucafaggianelli commented Sep 19, 2019

Node version: 10.16.3
Sails version (sails): 1.2.3
ORM hook version (sails-hook-orm): 2.1.1
Sockets hook version (sails-hook-sockets): 1.5.5
Organics hook version (sails-hook-organics): 1.0.0
Grunt hook version (sails-hook-grunt): 4.0.1
Uploads hook version (sails-hook-uploads): 0.4.3
DB adapter & version (e.g. sails-mysql@5.55.5): sails-mysql@1.0.1
Skipper adapter & version (e.g. skipper-s3@5.55.5): none


I don't know if it's the intended behavior, but for sure is very strange and not documented:

// I generate a large array with many entries
const arrayOfThings = [{}, {}, {}]

// I manipulate some entry and filter the array.
// The objects contained in the filtered array are the same of the original one,
// I didn't copy them.
const teamsToWrite = arrayOfThings.filter(x => x.league > 3)

await Team.createEach(teamsToWrite)

// later I use the original array, but the array entries present in teamsToWrite,
// have been modified with the created records
doOtherThings(arrayOfThings)

console.log(arrayOfThings.find(x => x.league > 3))
// { createdAt, updatedAt, id, ... }

Basically the input array has been modified by createEach. The docs say that the function doesn't return the created record but doesn't talk about preserving the array

@sailsbot
Copy link

@lucafaggianelli Thanks for posting! We'll take a look as soon as possible.

In the mean time, there are a few ways you can help speed things along:

  • look for a workaround. (Even if it's just temporary, sharing your solution can save someone else a lot of time and effort.)
  • tell us why this issue is important to you and your team. What are you trying to accomplish? (Submissions with a little bit of human context tend to be easier to understand and faster to resolve.)
  • make sure you've provided clear instructions on how to reproduce the bug from a clean install.
  • double-check that you've provided all of the requested version and dependency information. (Some of this info might seem irrelevant at first, like which database adapter you're using, but we ask that you include it anyway. Oftentimes an issue is caused by a confluence of unexpected factors, and it can save everybody a ton of time to know all the details up front.)
  • read the code of conduct.
  • if appropriate, ask your business to sponsor your issue. (Open source is our passion, and our core maintainers volunteer many of their nights and weekends working on Sails. But you only get so many nights and weekends in life, and stuff gets done a lot faster when you can work on it during normal daylight hours.)
  • let us know if you are using a 3rd party plugin; whether that's a database adapter, a non-standard view engine, or any other dependency maintained by someone other than our core team. (Besides the name of the 3rd party package, it helps to include the exact version you're using. If you're unsure, check out this list of all the core packages we maintain.)

Please remember: never post in a public forum if you believe you've found a genuine security vulnerability. Instead, disclose it responsibly.

For help with questions about Sails, click here.

@johnabrams7 johnabrams7 added orm Related to models, datastores, orm config, Waterline, sails-hook-orm, etc. needs documentation labels Sep 23, 2019
@whichking
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, @lucafaggianelli!

This is expected behavior as of Sails v1, but I'm not seeing that it's explicitly stated outside of the upgrade guide. We'll have to make this aspect of createEach() more obvious in the docs.

Regarding your issue, we recommend either cloning an array before passing it into createEach() or rethinking your code in other ways to account for this behavior.

Thanks for bringing this to our attention!

@lucafaggianelli
Copy link
Author

OK good to know! So just for clarification, the mutation of the argument happens on all CRUD methods, that is, create, set, delete? For example, I wouldn't need to do create(x).fetch() as x would be the newly created record?!??!

@whichking
Copy link
Contributor

@lucafaggianelli

It is true that criteria passed into any Waterline model method is now mutated, but it is also true that the default behavior of the methods create(), createEach(), update(), and destroy() is not to send back the created/updated/destroyed record(s). So you'll still need to use fetch() for those!

Here's the Waterline section of the upgrade guide that talks about this

Here's information pertaining specifically to the behavior of create(), createEach(), update(), and destroy()

@professor-rage
Copy link

Fascinating.

mongodb v3.6
sails-mongo v1.2
sailsjs v1.4

Mutated inputs from a create(input) and createEach(inputs) include the created record's ID(s), so technically a fetch() on createEach() isn't needed if you are only interested in grabbing the IDs.

I wouldn't recommend as I suspect this undocumented feature or bug, however you perceive it, may magically "go away" in a future release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
helpful info or workaround needs documentation orm Related to models, datastores, orm config, Waterline, sails-hook-orm, etc.
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants