feat(parser): Added Cognito trigger schemas

[VatsalGoel3]

Issue number: #6203

Summary

Changes

This PR adds full support for all Amazon Cognito User Pool Lambda Triggers as part of the Parser (Pydantic) utility. These include schemas for:

1. PreSignUp
2. PostConfirmation
3. PreAuthentication
4. PostAuthentication
5. PreTokenGeneration
6. MigrateUser
7. CustomMessage
8. CustomEmailSender
9. CustomSMSSender
10. DefineAuthChallenge
11. CreateAuthChallenge
12. VerifyAuthChallenge

Each schema includes:

• Strict Pydantic models with field aliases
• Unit tests based on sample event payloads
• Event fixture JSON files
• Centralized export in __init__.py

User experience

Before:

• Developers had to manually validate and parse Cognito Lambda events.
• No native schema validation via @parser for Cognito triggers.

After:

• Full schema validation for all supported Cognito Lambda events.
• Type-safe access to event fields via @parser(model=CognitoXxxEventModel).

Checklist

• Meet tenets criteria
• I have performed a self-review of this change
• Changes have been tested
• Changes are documented
• PR title follows conventional commit semantics

Is this a breaking change?

RFC issue number: N/A

Checklist:

• Migration process documented
• Implement warnings (if it can live side by side)

Acknowledgment

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

---

⚠️ Current blocker

Some schemas are currently failing validation in tests due to discrepancies in the sample fixture files:

• email_verified, phone_number_verified appear as bool in test events but the schema expects str
• Some optional nested fields are missing or provided as empty objects in test files
• Aliases like awsSdk vs awsSdkVersion cause mismatches

Would you prefer:

1. Loosening the validators and accepting bool | str, with appropriate aliases?
2. Or should we update the JSON test fixtures to match stricter validation?

[leandrodamascena]

Hey @VatsalGoel3 can you pls run make format and push a commit again? Ruff is complaining about some files.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.25%. Comparing base (0560746) to head (281a55a).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #6737      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    96.20%   96.25%   +0.04%     
===========================================
  Files          273      274       +1     
  Lines        12713    12856     +143     
  Branches       950      950              
===========================================
+ Hits         12231    12374     +143     
  Misses         377      377              
  Partials       105      105              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[leandrodamascena]

Hey @VatsalGoel3 thanks a lot for working in this PR! I had to make some changes to align with the TypeScript implementation: https://github.com/aws-powertools/powertools-lambda-typescript/blob/main/packages/parser/src/schemas/cognito.ts

@dreamorosi can you pls review this?