From 8b9fb1d28fc2bff376ea4fcccf5327a6d0855605 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?=D0=A1=D0=BA=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=BE=D1=80=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=B0=20?= =?UTF-8?q?=D0=9D=D0=B8=D0=BA=D0=B8=D1=82=D0=B0=20=D0=90=D0=BD=D0=B4=D1=80?= =?UTF-8?q?=D0=B5=D0=B5=D0=B2=D0=B8=D1=87?= Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 22:45:33 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Update README.md --- README.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 332be35..98d729b 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -102,12 +102,12 @@ Code search has both false negatives and false positives — some files are igno AST tree also ignores a list of excluded files and directories and minified code. -All data get out of date the moment you build it. - Downloads/month are not equal to popularity, and you can't see which version is being used. Code and AST search, among other things, takes only `latest` released package versions into an account. That could be significantly different from `master`, beta branches, also older versions could be much more popular that `latest`. +All datasets get out of date the moment you build them. + Scoped packages are ignored completely. Gzemnid deceives you, keep that in mind.