Skip to content

[tmpnet] Rename NodeProcess to ProcessRuntime #3890

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 17, 2025

Conversation

maru-ava
Copy link
Contributor

@maru-ava maru-ava commented Apr 17, 2025

PR Chain: tmpnet+kube

This PR chain enables tmpnet to deploy temporary networks to Kubernetes. Early PRs refactor tmpnet to support the addition in #3615 of a new tmpnet node runtime for kube.

Why this should be merged

This is intended to be consistent with the addition of KubeRuntime and the name of the runtime configuration (ProcessRuntimeConfig).

How this was tested

CI

Need to be documented in RELEASES.md?

N/A

TODO

@maru-ava maru-ava added the tooling Build, test and development tooling label Apr 17, 2025
@maru-ava maru-ava self-assigned this Apr 17, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Backlog 🗄️ in avalanchego Apr 17, 2025
@maru-ava maru-ava moved this from Backlog 🗄️ to In Review 👀 in avalanchego Apr 17, 2025
Base automatically changed from tmpnet-implicit-data-dir to master April 17, 2025 01:04
@maru-ava maru-ava force-pushed the tmpnet-rename-node-process branch 2 times, most recently from 69c9d0e to b0cb3a7 Compare April 17, 2025 01:12
This is intended to be consistent with the addition of KubeRuntime and
the name of the runtime configuration (ProcessRuntimeConfig).
@maru-ava maru-ava force-pushed the tmpnet-rename-node-process branch from b0cb3a7 to 62f6308 Compare April 17, 2025 01:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
tooling Build, test and development tooling
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants