From d15a28c7ff7d3b74987afd22f68e31f417f8a801 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: meaghanfitzgerald Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 17:04:20 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] remove redundant sentence --- content/guide/subnet-vs-l1-validators.mdx | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/content/guide/subnet-vs-l1-validators.mdx b/content/guide/subnet-vs-l1-validators.mdx index 1a20fcd..7648a63 100644 --- a/content/guide/subnet-vs-l1-validators.mdx +++ b/content/guide/subnet-vs-l1-validators.mdx @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ comments: true --- The Etna Upgrade introduced L1s to the Avalanche network, providing an enhanced sovereign network design to the original Subnet model. -This guide outlines the differences between Subnet and L1 validators, differentiating the requirements and capabilities of each. **L1 Validators**, introduced with ACP-77, represent a departure from this model, enabling the creation of sovereign L1 networks with minimal dependency on the Primary Network. Unlike Subnet Validators, L1 Validators do not stake AVAX but instead pay a dynamic monthly fee, initially set at approximately 1.3 AVAX. They are exempt from validating the Primary Network, reducing their resource requirements and making L1 validation more accessible. This approach fosters economic inclusivity and sovereignty, allowing developers to define custom validation logic via smart contracts and operate independent networks without staking the Primary Network.