feat(dummy_infrastructure): change to multiple virtual signal state outputs

[YoheiMishina]

Description

Modified to allow multiple states to be delivered to accommodate VTL in scenario simulation.
Added a mode to explore the state of Command.
Sends a state that permits Approve if the state is 1 or more in the Command from the Planner.

Related links

Tests performed

Scenarios involving VTLs were simulated to ensure that the goal was reached.

Notes for reviewers

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

• I've confirmed the contribution guidelines.
• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.
• The PR has been properly tested.
• The PR has been reviewed by the code owners.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

• There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.
• The PR is ready for merge.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1717 (fdd1a89) into main (c0f3507) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1717      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   10.40%   10.39%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1218     1218              
  Lines       87550    87597      +47     
  Branches    20511    20511              
==========================================
  Hits         9109     9109              
- Misses      68981    69028      +47     
  Partials     9460     9460              

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
differential	0.00% <0.00%> (?)
total	10.38% <0.00%> (ø)		Carriedforward from c0f3507

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...dummy_infrastructure/dummy_infrastructure_node.hpp	0.00% <ø> (ø)
..._infrastructure_node/dummy_infrastructure_node.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[tkimura4]

Isn't it better to change to this?

command.state >= InfrastructureCommand::REQUESTING

or

command.state != InfrastructureCommand::NONE

[YoheiMishina]

It looks better that way, so I changed it.
1f82970

[tkimura4]

LGTM