fix(obstacle_avoidance_planner): deal with wider path interval

[takayuki5168]

Signed-off-by: Takayuki Murooka takayuki5168@gmail.com

Description

Fix for obstacle_avoidance_planner to deal with wider (= more than 5.0m) behavior path interval.

Related links

Fix #798
#1369

Tests performed

Notes for reviewers

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

• I've confirmed the contribution guidelines.
• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.
• The PR has been properly tested.
• The PR has been reviewed by the code owners.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

• There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.
• The PR is ready for merge.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1616 (3eee1ab) into main (9f451b4) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1616      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   10.77%   10.77%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1111     1111              
  Lines       78530    78552      +22     
  Branches    18554    18554              
==========================================
  Hits         8464     8464              
- Misses      61206    61228      +22     
  Partials     8860     8860              

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
differential	0.00% <0.00%> (?)
total	10.76% <0.00%> (ø)		Carriedforward from 3baed53

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
planning/obstacle_avoidance_planner/src/node.cpp	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[taikitanaka3]

@takayuki5168
can you test using manual controller to see if ego paths goal after the goal?
for my test motion planning couldn't work

[ERROR] [component_container_mt-49]: process has died [pid 431036, exit code -6, cmd '/opt/ros/galactic/lib/rclcpp_components/component_container_mt --ros-args -r __node:=motion_planning_container -r __ns:=/planning/scenario_planning/lane_driving/motion_planning --params-file /tmp/launch_params_dcbqhho0'].

motion planning container died