Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Spatial decomposition (dynamic tree) for static geometry #11

Open
ashoulson opened this issue Jun 23, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Spatial decomposition (dynamic tree) for static geometry #11

ashoulson opened this issue Jun 23, 2015 · 2 comments
Labels
help wanted todo wishlist

Comments

@ashoulson
Copy link
Owner

Dynamic objects may not be worth it with rollback, but static objects probably are. Eventually we could even precompute this.

Don't need it right away, long-term optimization idea.
@ashoulson
Copy link
Owner Author

Attempted to do this in the revamp branch, but performance improvement wasn't satisfactory for the increased code complexity, increased memory usage, and decreased reliability.

@ashoulson
Copy link
Owner Author

Could probably do a BVH implementation for collision resolution only (in current time) while leaving queries to just use AABBs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
help wanted todo wishlist
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@ashoulson