Skip to content

design question: mvn support seems to be complicated #707

Description

@lispnik

From some debugging in #706 the mvn/aether code attempts to use already installed Maven and depending on its version, call different things.

I don't think ABCL should do that.

The mvn support in ABCL should bootstrap itself with a specific version of Maven and just use that rather than whatever is going on in $M2_HOME etc. This seems to be what tools such as leiningen do (via pomegranate – a wrapper for eclipse/maven aerther).

Thoughts on improving the ABCL maven support by bootstrapping with a specific version included?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions