Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency cookie to v1 #2506

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 13, 2025
Merged

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Mar 13, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
cookie 0.7.2 -> 1.0.2 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

jshttp/cookie (cookie)

v1.0.2

Compare Source

Fixed

Added

v1.0.1

Compare Source

Added

v1.0.0

Compare Source

Breaking changes

  • Use modern JS features, ship TypeScript definition (#​175) 1cc64ff
    • Adds __esModule marker, imports need to use import { parse, serialize } or import * as cookie
  • Minimum node.js v18
  • Uses null prototype object for parse return value
  • Changes strict and priority to match the lower case strings (i.e. low, not LOW or Low)
  • Require maxAge to be an integer using Number.isInteger check
  • Delegates decode implementation details to decode option (i.e. error handling and quote parsing is defined by decode)
  • Improve arg/option error messages (#​162) e206fd5 @​MaoShizhong

Other


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 13, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/cookie-1.x branch from 06359e7 to 80f726c Compare March 13, 2025 13:05
@ardatan ardatan merged commit e52650d into master Mar 13, 2025
9 of 11 checks passed
@ardatan ardatan deleted the renovate/cookie-1.x branch March 13, 2025 13:05
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 13, 2025

💻 Website Preview

The latest changes are available as preview in: https://a1dbb488.fets.pages.dev

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 13, 2025

✅ Benchmark Results

     ✓ no_errors{server:node-http,mode:no-schema}
     ✓ expected_result{server:node-http,mode:no-schema}
     ✓ no_errors{server:node-http,mode:json-schema}
     ✓ expected_result{server:node-http,mode:json-schema}
     ✓ no_errors{server:uWebSockets,mode:no-schema}
     ✓ expected_result{server:uWebSockets,mode:no-schema}
     ✓ no_errors{server:uWebSockets,mode:json-schema}
     ✓ expected_result{server:uWebSockets,mode:json-schema}

     checks......................................: 100.00% ✓ 854264      ✗ 0     
     data_received...............................: 78 MB   646 kB/s
     data_sent...................................: 54 MB   452 kB/s
     http_req_blocked............................: avg=1.56µs   min=891ns    med=1.49µs   max=620.33µs p(90)=1.95µs   p(95)=2.1µs   
     http_req_connecting.........................: avg=1ns      min=0s       med=0s       max=164.53µs p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      
     http_req_duration...........................: avg=201.7µs  min=135.19µs med=190.93µs max=8.69ms   p(90)=217.55µs p(95)=226.98µs
       { expected_response:true }................: avg=201.7µs  min=135.19µs med=190.93µs max=8.69ms   p(90)=217.55µs p(95)=226.98µs
     ✓ { server:node-http,mode:json-schema }.....: avg=216.81µs min=161.39µs med=205.34µs max=6.14ms   p(90)=229.43µs p(95)=238.3µs 
     ✓ { server:node-http,mode:no-schema }.......: avg=207.88µs min=149.74µs med=194.06µs max=6.31ms   p(90)=218.39µs p(95)=229.44µs
     ✓ { server:uWebSockets,mode:json-schema }...: avg=196.18µs min=146.12µs med=187.29µs max=8.69ms   p(90)=208.65µs p(95)=215.43µs
     ✓ { server:uWebSockets,mode:no-schema }.....: avg=187.8µs  min=135.19µs med=178.64µs max=6.78ms   p(90)=200µs    p(95)=207.18µs
     http_req_failed.............................: 0.00%   ✓ 0           ✗ 427132
     http_req_receiving..........................: avg=23.21µs  min=11.67µs  med=22.36µs  max=2.79ms   p(90)=27.65µs  p(95)=29.95µs 
     http_req_sending............................: avg=8.96µs   min=5.36µs   med=9.03µs   max=465.28µs p(90)=11.65µs  p(95)=13µs    
     http_req_tls_handshaking....................: avg=0s       min=0s       med=0s       max=0s       p(90)=0s       p(95)=0s      
     http_req_waiting............................: avg=169.52µs min=108.32µs med=159.3µs  max=8.62ms   p(90)=184.02µs p(95)=192.8µs 
     http_reqs...................................: 427132  3559.395425/s
     iteration_duration..........................: avg=276.11µs min=196.73µs med=264.75µs max=8.84ms   p(90)=294.18µs p(95)=305.33µs
     iterations..................................: 427132  3559.395425/s
     vus.........................................: 1       min=1         max=1   
     vus_max.....................................: 2       min=2         max=2   

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant