Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Disputes: allow ruling options to be customizable per arbitrable instance #398

Open
sohkai opened this issue Sep 7, 2020 · 0 comments
Open
Labels
enhancement New enhancement request

Comments

@sohkai
Copy link
Contributor

sohkai commented Sep 7, 2020

The Court allows the IArbitrable to define as many rulings as they'd like, and assign whatever meaning they'd like to each number.

At the moment, we hardcode 3 to be "reject" ("block action") and 4 to be "allow" ("allow action"), but this can change based on the IArbitrable creating the dispute.

For example, with the original Agreement, we were expecting 3 to be "allow" ("in favour of submitter") and 4 to be "block" ("in favour of challenger").


It would be ideal for us to dynamically associate a different dispute frontend / set of ruling options based on the type or instance of IArbitrable used.

@sohkai sohkai added the enhancement New enhancement request label Sep 7, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New enhancement request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant