Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FVM HeatCheck #23

Closed
jimmylee opened this issue Jan 18, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed

FVM HeatCheck #23

jimmylee opened this issue Jan 18, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@jimmylee
Copy link

jimmylee commented Jan 18, 2023

Scratching some notes will close later...

General Issues

@snissn - filecoin-project/lotus#9839
@snissn @alvin-reyes - filecoin-project/lotus#8865 (6 months stale), collaboration with @geoff-vball (thanks)

Add the multisig approve and proposal commands plus an feature to automatically encode the json string passed as parameters .

lingering questions

what are the implications of not having/storing this index by default? Does this mean that solidity/EVM developers would need to either run, or find, a node that supports proper ethereum transaction hashes? If a developer deploys a contract to a node that doesn't have this index, do they still get a proper eth transaction back? If so, can they not poll against the receipt on the same node? What about block explorers?

resolution PR: filecoin-project/lotus#9965

Specs

@jlogelin A trustless notary - application-research/estuary#877
@jlogelin Hot Storage Protocol - application-research/estuary#878
@jlogelin Automated Market Maker - application-research/estuary#879
@jlogelin DataDAO - application-research/estuary#880
@jlogelin @jcace @elijaharita - Data Persistence application-research/estuary#881

Solutioning

@alvin-reyes - ERC 721 Contracts - https://github.com/application-research/fevm-nft-estuary

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant