Re-add NIO as a dependency of our library targets. #1937
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation:
In #1935 I removed NIO as a dependency of a number of our library
targets. This unfortunately led to some downstream breakage in modules
that were (incorrectly) assuming they could import NIO without
expressing a dependency on it in their Package.swift, e.g.
swift-server/swift-aws-lambda-runtime#218.
While a forums thread
(https://forums.swift.org/t/semantic-versioning-should-removing-a-dependency-be-a-semver-major/51179)
is ongoing to discuss the implications of this, we should re-add the
dependency to undo the breakage against main. I've validated this
locally: merely having the dependency is enough, we don't have to use
it.
Modifications:
Result:
Broken downstreams can build again.