Skip to content

Avoid deprecation warnings in JDBCSuite. #4668

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Avoid deprecation warnings in JDBCSuite. #4668

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

tmyklebu
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request replaces calls to deprecated methods from java.util.Date with near-equivalents in java.util.Calendar.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 18, 2015

Test build #27669 has started for PR 4668 at commit 66215b1.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 18, 2015

Test build #27669 has finished for PR 4668 at commit 66215b1.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27669/
Test PASSed.

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

rxin commented Feb 18, 2015

This is great. Thanks!

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2015
@tmyklebu @rxin
Avoid deprecation warnings in JDBCSuite.
9a565b8 
This pull request replaces calls to deprecated methods from `java.util.Date` with near-equivalents in `java.util.Calendar`.

Author: Tor Myklebust <tmyklebu@gmail.com>

Closes #4668 from tmyklebu/master and squashes the following commits:

66215b1 [Tor Myklebust] Use GregorianCalendar instead of Timestamp get methods.

(cherry picked from commit de0dd6d)
Signed-off-by: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in de0dd6d Feb 18, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@tmyklebu @SparkQA @AmplabJenkins @rxin