[SPARK-47129][CONNECT][SQL][3.5] Make ResolveRelations cache connect plan properly#46291
Closed
zhengruifeng wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:branch-3.5from
Closed
[SPARK-47129][CONNECT][SQL][3.5] Make ResolveRelations cache connect plan properly#46291zhengruifeng wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:branch-3.5from
zhengruifeng wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:branch-3.5from
Conversation
Member
|
Please update the JIRA information first because we cannot backport an improvement, @zhengruifeng . 
|
Contributor
Author
|
thanks @dongjoon-hyun for reminder, I have updated the Type and versions |
dongjoon-hyun
approved these changes
Apr 30, 2024
Member
dongjoon-hyun
left a comment
dongjoon-hyun
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
+1, LGTM. Thank you, @zhengruifeng .
Contributor
Author
|
the failed java linter seems unrelated, it was already broken in branch-3.5 https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/8886943128/job/24404782422 |
zhengruifeng
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 30, 2024
…plan properly ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? Make `ResolveRelations` handle plan id properly cherry-pick bugfix #45214 to 3.5 ### Why are the changes needed? bug fix for Spark Connect, it won't affect classic Spark SQL before this PR: ``` from pyspark.sql import functions as sf spark.range(10).withColumn("value_1", sf.lit(1)).write.saveAsTable("test_table_1") spark.range(10).withColumnRenamed("id", "index").withColumn("value_2", sf.lit(2)).write.saveAsTable("test_table_2") df1 = spark.read.table("test_table_1") df2 = spark.read.table("test_table_2") df3 = spark.read.table("test_table_1") join1 = df1.join(df2, on=df1.id==df2.index).select(df2.index, df2.value_2) join2 = df3.join(join1, how="left", on=join1.index==df3.id) join2.schema ``` fails with ``` AnalysisException: [CANNOT_RESOLVE_DATAFRAME_COLUMN] Cannot resolve dataframe column "id". It's probably because of illegal references like `df1.select(df2.col("a"))`. SQLSTATE: 42704 ``` That is due to existing plan caching in `ResolveRelations` doesn't work with Spark Connect ``` === Applying Rule org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis.Analyzer$ResolveRelations === '[#12]Join LeftOuter, '`==`('index, 'id) '[#12]Join LeftOuter, '`==`('index, 'id) !:- '[#9]UnresolvedRelation [test_table_1], [], false :- '[#9]SubqueryAlias spark_catalog.default.test_table_1 !+- '[#11]Project ['index, 'value_2] : +- 'UnresolvedCatalogRelation `spark_catalog`.`default`.`test_table_1`, [], false ! +- '[#10]Join Inner, '`==`('id, 'index) +- '[#11]Project ['index, 'value_2] ! :- '[#7]UnresolvedRelation [test_table_1], [], false +- '[#10]Join Inner, '`==`('id, 'index) ! +- '[#8]UnresolvedRelation [test_table_2], [], false :- '[#9]SubqueryAlias spark_catalog.default.test_table_1 ! : +- 'UnresolvedCatalogRelation `spark_catalog`.`default`.`test_table_1`, [], false ! +- '[#8]SubqueryAlias spark_catalog.default.test_table_2 ! +- 'UnresolvedCatalogRelation `spark_catalog`.`default`.`test_table_2`, [], false Can not resolve 'id with plan 7 ``` `[#7]UnresolvedRelation [test_table_1], [], false` was wrongly resolved to the cached one ``` :- '[#9]SubqueryAlias spark_catalog.default.test_table_1 +- 'UnresolvedCatalogRelation `spark_catalog`.`default`.`test_table_1`, [], false ``` ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? yes, bug fix ### How was this patch tested? added ut ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? ci Closes #46291 from zhengruifeng/connect_fix_read_join_35. Authored-by: Ruifeng Zheng <ruifengz@apache.org> Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Zheng <ruifengz@apache.org>
Contributor
Author
|
thanks @dongjoon-hyun so much! merged to branch-3.5 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Make
ResolveRelationshandle plan id properlycherry-pick bugfix #45214 to 3.5
Why are the changes needed?
bug fix for Spark Connect, it won't affect classic Spark SQL
before this PR:
fails with
That is due to existing plan caching in
ResolveRelationsdoesn't work with Spark Connect[#7]UnresolvedRelation [test_table_1], [], falsewas wrongly resolved to the cached oneDoes this PR introduce any user-facing change?
yes, bug fix
How was this patch tested?
added ut
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
ci