Skip to content

[SPARK-17927][SQL] Remove dead code in WriterContainer. #15477

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

rxin
Copy link
Contributor

@rxin rxin commented Oct 14, 2016

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

speculationEnabled and DATASOURCE_OUTPUTPATH seem like just dead code.

How was this patch tested?

Tests should fail if they are not dead code.

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor Author

rxin commented Oct 14, 2016

cc @hvanhovell @cloud-fan

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Oct 14, 2016

Test build #66933 has finished for PR 15477 at commit 4597a32.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@cloud-fan
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM, merging to master!

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 8543996 Oct 14, 2016
robert3005 pushed a commit to palantir/spark that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2016
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
speculationEnabled and DATASOURCE_OUTPUTPATH seem like just dead code.

## How was this patch tested?
Tests should fail if they are not dead code.

Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>

Closes apache#15477 from rxin/SPARK-17927.
uzadude pushed a commit to uzadude/spark that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2017
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
speculationEnabled and DATASOURCE_OUTPUTPATH seem like just dead code.

## How was this patch tested?
Tests should fail if they are not dead code.

Author: Reynold Xin <rxin@databricks.com>

Closes apache#15477 from rxin/SPARK-17927.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants