[SPARK-21492][SQL][FOLLOW UP] Reimplement UnsafeExternalRowSorter in database style iterator

### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Reimplement the iterator in UnsafeExternalRowSorter in database style. This can be done by reusing the `RowIterator` in our code base.

### Why are the changes needed?
During the job in #26164, after involving a var `isReleased` in `hasNext`, there's possible that `isReleased` is false when calling `hasNext`, but it becomes true before calling `next`. A safer way is using database-style iterator: `advanceNext` and `getRow`.

### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.

### How was this patch tested?
Existing UT.

Closes #26229 from xuanyuanking/SPARK-21492-follow-up.

Authored-by: Yuanjian Li <xyliyuanjian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>

Author: xuanyuanking

sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/RowIterator.scala renamed to sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/RowIterator.scala

@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
 import java.io.IOException;
 import java.util.function.Supplier;
 
-import scala.collection.AbstractIterator;
 import scala.collection.Iterator;
 import scala.math.Ordering;
 
@@ -168,39 +167,40 @@ public void cleanupResources() {
     sorter.cleanupResources();
   }
 
-  public Iterator<UnsafeRow> sort() throws IOException {
+  public Iterator<InternalRow> sort() throws IOException {
     try {
       final UnsafeSorterIterator sortedIterator = sorter.getSortedIterator();
       if (!sortedIterator.hasNext()) {
         // Since we won't ever call next() on an empty iterator, we need to clean up resources
         // here in order to prevent memory leaks.
         cleanupResources();
       }
-      return new AbstractIterator<UnsafeRow>() {
+      return new RowIterator() {
 
         private final int numFields = schema.length();
         private UnsafeRow row = new UnsafeRow(numFields);
 
         @Override
-        public boolean hasNext() {
-          return !isReleased && sortedIterator.hasNext();
-        }
-
-        @Override
-        public UnsafeRow next() {
+        public boolean advanceNext() {
           try {
-            sortedIterator.loadNext();
-            row.pointTo(
-              sortedIterator.getBaseObject(),
-              sortedIterator.getBaseOffset(),
-              sortedIterator.getRecordLength());
-            if (!hasNext()) {
-              UnsafeRow copy = row.copy(); // so that we don't have dangling pointers to freed page
-              row = null; // so that we don't keep references to the base object
-              cleanupResources();
-              return copy;
+            if (!isReleased && sortedIterator.hasNext()) {
+              sortedIterator.loadNext();
+              row.pointTo(
+                  sortedIterator.getBaseObject(),
+                  sortedIterator.getBaseOffset(),
+                  sortedIterator.getRecordLength());
+              // Here is the initial bug fix in SPARK-9364: the bug fix of use-after-free bug
+              // when returning the last row from an iterator. For example, in
+              // [[GroupedIterator]], we still use the last row after traversing the iterator
+              // in `fetchNextGroupIterator`
+              if (!sortedIterator.hasNext()) {
+                row = row.copy(); // so that we don't have dangling pointers to freed page
+                cleanupResources();
+              }
+              return true;
             } else {
-              return row;
+              row = null; // so that we don't keep references to the base object
+              return false;
             }
           } catch (IOException e) {
             cleanupResources();
@@ -210,14 +210,18 @@ public UnsafeRow next() {
           }
           throw new RuntimeException("Exception should have been re-thrown in next()");
         }
-      };
+
+        @Override
+        public UnsafeRow getRow() { return row; }
+
+      }.toScala();
     } catch (IOException e) {
       cleanupResources();
       throw e;
     }
   }
 
-  public Iterator<UnsafeRow> sort(Iterator<UnsafeRow> inputIterator) throws IOException {
+  public Iterator<InternalRow> sort(Iterator<UnsafeRow> inputIterator) throws IOException {
     while (inputIterator.hasNext()) {
       insertRow(inputIterator.next());
     }