Expose get_all_registered_operators and get_operator_arguments in the…

[larroy]

… Python API.

Resolves #15367

@sandeep-krishnamurthy

Checklist

I checked that opperf.py runs with the changes provided.

Essentials

Please feel free to remove inapplicable items for your PR.

• The PR title starts with [MXNET-$JIRA_ID], where $JIRA_ID refers to the relevant JIRA issue created (except PRs with tiny changes)
• Changes are complete (i.e. I finished coding on this PR)
• All changes have test coverage:
• Unit tests are added for small changes to verify correctness (e.g. adding a new operator)
• Nightly tests are added for complicated/long-running ones (e.g. changing distributed kvstore)
• Build tests will be added for build configuration changes (e.g. adding a new build option with NCCL)
• Code is well-documented:
• For user-facing API changes, API doc string has been updated.
• For new C++ functions in header files, their functionalities and arguments are documented.
• For new examples, README.md is added to explain the what the example does, the source of the dataset, expected performance on test set and reference to the original paper if applicable
• Check the API doc at http://mxnet-ci-doc.s3-accelerate.dualstack.amazonaws.com/PR-$PR_ID/$BUILD_ID/index.html
• To the my best knowledge, examples are either not affected by this change, or have been fixed to be compatible with this change

[sandeep-krishnamurthy]

Thanks @larroy

Overall looks good to me. However, this is adding 2 new public facing APIs. I prefer you create a RFC github issue, have a discussion and get community feedback on the same.

[larroy]

@marcoabreu addressed your comments.

[anirudhacharya]

@mxnet-label-bot add [pr-awaiting-review]

[wkcn]

Great! LGTM. Thank you!

[wkcn]

If there is not any propose in the RFC, it's good to merge.

[wkcn]

Merged. Thank you!