Skip to content

MINOR: Catch InvocationTargetException explicitly and propagate underlying cause #12230

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 23, 2022

Conversation

divijvaidya
Copy link
Member

InvocationTargetException always wraps an underlying cause. It makes sense to catch it as soon as possible and only propagate the underlying cause.

Change

  1. Replace "legacy" [1] with getCause()
  2. Propagate the cause after catching InvocationTargetException

[1] "legacy as per the docs" https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/lang/reflect/InvocationTargetException.html

Copy link
Contributor

@Kvicii Kvicii left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@divijvaidya divijvaidya force-pushed the fixInvocationTarget branch from 46f1013 to 73afd1b Compare June 8, 2022 15:51
@divijvaidya
Copy link
Member Author

@dengziming @showuon please review this small change.

Copy link
Member

@ijuma ijuma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR, left a couple of comments.

@@ -463,8 +463,7 @@ public static <T> T newParameterizedInstance(String className, Object... params)
throw new ClassNotFoundException(String.format("Unable to access " +
"constructor of %s", className), e);
} catch (InvocationTargetException e) {
throw new ClassNotFoundException(String.format("Unable to invoke " +
"constructor of %s", className), e);
throw new KafkaException(String.format("The constructor of %s threw an exception", className), e.getCause());
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have we checked that changing this exception doesn't cause an issue?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. This method is only used in trogdor today and there is no specific handling of ClassNotFoundException exception.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we throw ClassNotFoundException like before, and pass e.getCause() to it instead? I think throwing ClassNotFoundException for consistency is better.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wouldn't a ClassNotFoundException be wrong in this context and give a wrong impression to user? I am saying this because it's not a problem with Class not being on the JVM's classpath, instead InvocationTargetException is thrown when we have found the Class and invoking the constructor is throwing an exception in the line constructor.newInstance(args

I am happy to replace KafkaException with other generic RuntimeException that you would suggest but ClassNotFoundException appears inappropriate to me.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point! You're right! When entering here, the constructor is already found and called, just there's exception thrown. Let's keep KafkaException like you did. Thank you.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

True, but I would disagree that it is a downside.

In my opinion, a caller should be handling the underlying cause because the InvocationTargetException is being thrown from business logic inside the constructor. If the caller catches a generic ReflectiveOperationException it doesn't get to know (without inspecting details) whether the exception is due to a "reflection op error" such as method not found, class not found etc. or whether it is an exception thrown by the business logic itself. I believe that propagating the underlying business logic exception is better in this scenario.

Having said that, I don't have a strong opinion on this one as it's a minor improvement that will only impact code debuggability when looking at exception traces. Happy to revert if you think otherwise.

Copy link
Contributor

@mdedetrich mdedetrich Aug 26, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I also agree with @divijvaidya here, having a strong distinction between business logic and reflection based exceptions is ideal and in my opinion over the long term is less brittle (since if you catch business logic exceptions that is unlikely to change)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The caller may be itself generic code. For example, see what happened here:

https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/12230/files#diff-ac079c35d502aee90e8bbfa3b71cd9deda5ad4ffb49364fcc23a9278a848241cR79

The method now throws Throwable. It was pretty hard for me to say whether we needed to update some code to handle other exceptions. Is it clear to you?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ijuma , thanks for the explanation. Make sense to me.
@divijvaidya I think it's better we revert it. WDYT?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@showuon sure, let's do it. I understand the POV where @ijuma is coming from.

@divijvaidya
Copy link
Member Author

@mimaison kindly review when you get a chance.

Copy link
Contributor

@mdedetrich mdedetrich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes look good from my end

@divijvaidya
Copy link
Member Author

@showuon requesting for your code review time on this one. We already have two approvals from non-committers.

@divijvaidya
Copy link
Member Author

The failing tests for JDK 11 are unrelated to the code changes.

Build / JDK 11 and Scala 2.13 / testLargeAssignmentAndGroupWithNonEqualSubscription() – org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.StickyAssignorTest
1m 3s
Build / JDK 11 and Scala 2.13 / testPrepareJoinAndRejoinAfterFailedRebalance() – org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.internals.EagerConsumerCoordinatorTest
<1s
Build / JDK 11 and Scala 2.13 / testTimeouts() – org.apache.kafka.controller.QuorumControllerTest

@ijuma @mimaison requesting your your time to review this. Please note that we have this triaged with two non-committers already.

Copy link
Member

@showuon showuon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@divijvaidya , sorry for the delay. Overall LGTM, left one comment.

@@ -463,8 +463,7 @@ public static <T> T newParameterizedInstance(String className, Object... params)
throw new ClassNotFoundException(String.format("Unable to access " +
"constructor of %s", className), e);
} catch (InvocationTargetException e) {
throw new ClassNotFoundException(String.format("Unable to invoke " +
"constructor of %s", className), e);
throw new KafkaException(String.format("The constructor of %s threw an exception", className), e.getCause());
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we throw ClassNotFoundException like before, and pass e.getCause() to it instead? I think throwing ClassNotFoundException for consistency is better.

@showuon showuon merged commit 9aef992 into apache:trunk Aug 23, 2022
@divijvaidya divijvaidya deleted the fixInvocationTarget branch August 23, 2022 09:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants