From 450e790f46dba9461e144a41e6749acd68cfef51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: kamille Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 11:19:00 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] add todo about considering if we can skip `UnresolvedPartitionedScan` and generate `ResolvedPartitionedScan` directly. --- df_engine_extensions/src/dist_sql_query/physical_plan.rs | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/df_engine_extensions/src/dist_sql_query/physical_plan.rs b/df_engine_extensions/src/dist_sql_query/physical_plan.rs index 5df539e31c..1d44d0a89c 100644 --- a/df_engine_extensions/src/dist_sql_query/physical_plan.rs +++ b/df_engine_extensions/src/dist_sql_query/physical_plan.rs @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ use table_engine::{ /// Placeholder of partitioned table's scan plan /// It is inexecutable actually and just for carrying the necessary information /// of building remote execution plans for sub tables. +// TODO: can we skip this and generate `ResolvedPartitionedScan` directly? #[derive(Debug)] pub struct UnresolvedPartitionedScan { pub sub_tables: Vec,