-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.1k
HDFS-17381. Distcp of EC files should not be limited to DFS. #7083
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
💔 -1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
💔 -1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
b9ec09c
to
cdeb8df
Compare
💔 -1 overall
This message was automatically generated. |
@steveloughran could you please review and merge this backport? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1. will merge later.
There are checkstyle warnings but I suppose they are carried over from the original commit, so I'm not going to change it and make future backports tricky.
Ideally we should have contract tests for the new FileSystem interface (like what we did in HADOOP-18671/ #5553
Thanks @jojochuang , These are not from the original commit but due to HDFS-17461 missing on branch-3.4 . I have cherry-picked that change (not part of the original commit) in this same PR in this commit but somehow the CI still shows this warning. |
Pushed locally to github branch-3.4. |
(I pushed locally to preserve commit history. otherwise I'd be forced to squash the two commits) |
Description of PR
Backport of HDFS-17381 from trunk to branch-3.4
How was this patch tested?
Unit tests added