YARN-11381. Fix hadoop-yarn-common module Java Doc Errors.

[slfan1989]

JIRA: YARN-11381. Fix hadoop-yarn-common module Java Doc Errors.

The java doc problem has been fixed once, but during the PR compilation process of YARN-11373, the Java Doc error appeared again.

We can view the report as follows:

https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-5146/6/artifact/out/patch-javadoc-hadoop-yarn-project_hadoop-yarn_hadoop-yarn-common-jdkUbuntu-11.0.17+8-post-Ubuntu-1ubuntu220.04.txt

I follow the compilation prompts and fix the package-info.java of the module.

[hadoop-yetus]

💔 -1 overall

Vote	Subsystem	Runtime	Logfile	Comment
+0 🆗	reexec	0m 56s		Docker mode activated.
			_ Prechecks _
+1 💚	dupname	0m 0s		No case conflicting files found.
+0 🆗	codespell	0m 1s		codespell was not available.
+0 🆗	detsecrets	0m 1s		detect-secrets was not available.
+1 💚	@author	0m 0s		The patch does not contain any @author tags.
-1 ❌	test4tests	0m 0s		The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.
			_ trunk Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	39m 26s		trunk passed
+1 💚	compile	1m 3s		trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.16+8-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚	compile	0m 52s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_342-8u342-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
+1 💚	checkstyle	0m 52s		trunk passed
+1 💚	mvnsite	0m 55s		trunk passed
+1 💚	javadoc	1m 11s		trunk passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.16+8-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 51s		trunk passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_342-8u342-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
+1 💚	spotbugs	1m 55s		trunk passed
+1 💚	shadedclient	21m 26s		branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Patch Compile Tests _
+1 💚	mvninstall	0m 42s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	0m 49s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.16+8-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚	javac	0m 49s		the patch passed
+1 💚	compile	0m 40s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_342-8u342-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
+1 💚	javac	0m 40s		the patch passed
+1 💚	blanks	0m 0s		The patch has no blanks issues.
+1 💚	checkstyle	0m 28s		hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-common: The patch generated 0 new + 0 unchanged - 23 fixed = 0 total (was 23)
+1 💚	mvnsite	0m 42s		the patch passed
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 42s		the patch passed with JDK Ubuntu-11.0.16+8-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04
+1 💚	javadoc	0m 40s		the patch passed with JDK Private Build-1.8.0_342-8u342-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
+1 💚	spotbugs	1m 47s		the patch passed
+1 💚	shadedclient	21m 20s		patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
			_ Other Tests _
+1 💚	unit	5m 40s		hadoop-yarn-common in the patch passed.
+1 💚	asflicense	0m 50s		The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
		104m 11s

Subsystem	Report/Notes
Docker	ClientAPI=1.41 ServerAPI=1.41 base: https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-5179/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR	#5179
Optional Tests	dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient spotbugs checkstyle codespell detsecrets
uname	Linux 470b8074b435 4.15.0-191-generic #202-Ubuntu SMP Thu Aug 4 01:49:29 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool	maven
Personality	dev-support/bin/hadoop.sh
git revision	trunk / 71da4cd
Default Java	Private Build-1.8.0_342-8u342-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
Multi-JDK versions	/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64:Ubuntu-11.0.16+8-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04 /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64:Private Build-1.8.0_342-8u342-b07-0ubuntu1~20.04-b07
Test Results	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-5179/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count	556 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules	C: hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-common U: hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-common
Console output	https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-5179/1/console
versions	git=2.25.1 maven=3.6.3 spotbugs=4.2.2
Powered by	Apache Yetus 0.14.0 https://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

[slfan1989]

@ayushtkn Can you help review this PR? Thank you very much! We still have some package-info.java files to fix, in this pr, I fixed them.

[slfan1989]

@goiri Thank you very much for helping to review the code!