Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HDDS-2023. Fix rat check failures in trunk #1342

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

vivekratnavel
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@vivekratnavel
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label ozone

@elek elek added the ozone label Aug 23, 2019
@vivekratnavel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@elek @anuengineer Please review

Copy link
Contributor

@adoroszlai adoroszlai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @vivekratnavel for the fix. Verified with rat.sh (after fixes in #1343).

Copy link
Member

@elek elek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 thanks the fix very much.

I am enabling the rat checks in the argo based ozone builds:

https://github.com/elek/argo-ozone

@elek elek closed this in e2a5548 Aug 23, 2019
@hadoop-yetus
Copy link

💔 -1 overall

Vote Subsystem Runtime Comment
0 reexec 40 Docker mode activated.
_ Prechecks _
+1 dupname 1 No case conflicting files found.
+1 @author 0 The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 test4tests 0 The patch appears to include 5 new or modified test files.
_ trunk Compile Tests _
0 mvndep 73 Maven dependency ordering for branch
+1 mvninstall 610 trunk passed
+1 compile 344 trunk passed
+1 checkstyle 64 trunk passed
+1 mvnsite 0 trunk passed
+1 shadedclient 790 branch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
+1 javadoc 156 trunk passed
0 spotbugs 408 Used deprecated FindBugs config; considering switching to SpotBugs.
+1 findbugs 602 trunk passed
_ Patch Compile Tests _
0 mvndep 29 Maven dependency ordering for patch
+1 mvninstall 546 the patch passed
+1 compile 364 the patch passed
+1 javac 364 the patch passed
+1 checkstyle 70 the patch passed
+1 mvnsite 0 the patch passed
+1 whitespace 0 The patch has no whitespace issues.
+1 shadedclient 667 patch has no errors when building and testing our client artifacts.
+1 javadoc 152 the patch passed
+1 findbugs 616 the patch passed
_ Other Tests _
+1 unit 282 hadoop-hdds in the patch passed.
-1 unit 1729 hadoop-ozone in the patch failed.
+1 asflicense 45 The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
7328
Reason Tests
Failed junit tests hadoop.ozone.client.rpc.TestOzoneAtRestEncryption
hadoop.ozone.container.server.TestSecureContainerServer
hadoop.ozone.om.TestOzoneManagerHA
Subsystem Report/Notes
Docker Client=19.03.1 Server=19.03.1 base: https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-1342/1/artifact/out/Dockerfile
GITHUB PR #1342
Optional Tests dupname asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle
uname Linux fbadb4fcee90 4.4.0-138-generic #164-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 2 17:16:02 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Build tool maven
Personality personality/hadoop.sh
git revision trunk / bd7baea
Default Java 1.8.0_222
unit https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-1342/1/artifact/out/patch-unit-hadoop-ozone.txt
Test Results https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-1342/1/testReport/
Max. process+thread count 5213 (vs. ulimit of 5500)
modules C: hadoop-hdds/common hadoop-ozone/common hadoop-ozone/dist hadoop-ozone/integration-test hadoop-ozone/ozone-manager U: .
Console output https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-1342/1/console
versions git=2.7.4 maven=3.3.9 findbugs=3.1.0-RC1
Powered by Apache Yetus 0.10.0 http://yetus.apache.org

This message was automatically generated.

amahussein pushed a commit to amahussein/hadoop that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2019
RogPodge pushed a commit to RogPodge/hadoop that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants