SeekableStreamSupervisor: Don't await task futures in workerExec. #17403
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Following #17394,
workerExec
can get deadlocked with itself, because it waits for task futures and is also used as theconnectExec
for the task client. To fix this, we need to never await task futures in theworkerExec
.There are two specific changes: in
verifyAndMergeCheckpoints
andcheckpointTaskGroup
, twocoalesceAndAwait
calls that formerly occurred inworkerExec
are replaced withFutures.transform
(using a callback inworkerExec
instead).Because this adjustment removes a source of blocking, it may also improve supervisor responsiveness for high task counts. This is not the primary goal, however. The primary goal is to fix the bug introduced by #17394.