-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[fix](multi-table-load) fix multi table load can not finish #29957
Conversation
run buildall |
1 similar comment
run buildall |
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
1 similar comment
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 39943 ms
|
(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result: |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 178647 ms
|
run buildall |
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
TeamCity be ut coverage result: |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 40100 ms
|
(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result: |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 179479 ms
|
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 30.94 s
|
run buildall |
TeamCity be ut coverage result: |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 40008 ms
|
(From new machine)TeamCity pipeline, clickbench performance test result: |
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
run buildall |
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 39614 ms
|
TeamCity be ut coverage result: |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 177369 ms
|
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 30.81 s
|
Load test result on machine: 'aliyun_ecs.c7a.8xlarge_32C64G'
|
run buildall |
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
run buildall |
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 38951 ms
|
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 176822 ms
|
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 30.75 s
|
Load test result on machine: 'aliyun_ecs.c7a.8xlarge_32C64G'
|
TeamCity be ut coverage result: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
Proposed changes
Multi table load task could can not finish in this situation:
If threadB faster than thread A, the task would not finish util abort after timeout, for consumer done would not set task finish status. Therefore, adding reference count check to consumer.
Further comments
If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at dev@doris.apache.org by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...