Docs: add more PR guidance in contributing guide (smaller PRs) #6546
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
alamb
changed the title
r4ntix
reviewed
Jun 6, 2023
|
|
||
| When reviewing PRs, please remember our primary goal is to improve DataFusion and its community together. PR feedback should be constructive with the aim to help improve the code as well as the understanding of the contributor. | ||
|
|
||
| Please ensure any issues you raise contains a rationale and suggested alternative -- it is frustrating to be told "don't do it this way" without any clear reason or alternate provided. |
|
LGTM |
jackwener
approved these changes
Jun 6, 2023
izveigor
approved these changes
Jun 6, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
N/A
Rationale for this change
I have had PR size discussions with various people over time and I wanted to write down suggestions so that
Most recently this came up with @izveigor on #6384 but I have had similar exchanges with @ozankabak and likely others
What changes are included in this PR?
Add a suggestion in the contributor section of the docs
Are these changes tested?
N/A
Are there any user-facing changes?
Docs