Skip to content

Add note in upgrade guide about changes to Expr::Scalar in 48.0.0 #16360

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 16, 2025

Conversation

alamb
Copy link
Contributor

@alamb alamb commented Jun 11, 2025

Which issue does this PR close?

Rationale for this change

I hit another required change while testing the delta-rs upgrade, which I wanted to document

What changes are included in this PR?

  1. Add a note to the upgrade guide about changes in Expr::Scalar in 48.0.0
Screenshot 2025-06-10 at 8 06 43 PM

Are these changes tested?

Are there any user-facing changes?

Docs only

@github-actions github-actions bot added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jun 11, 2025
@@ -200,7 +235,7 @@ working but no one knows due to lack of test coverage).

[api deprecation guidelines]: https://datafusion.apache.org/contributor-guide/api-health.html#deprecation-guidelines

### `PartitionedFile` added as an arguement to the `FileOpener` trait
### `PartitionedFile` added as an argument to the `FileOpener` trait
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

drive by fix that I noticed while I had the docs open

Copy link
Contributor

@comphead comphead left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @alamb

I'm creating a ticket to generate a upgrade guide or part of it from deprecated attribute

@comphead
Copy link
Contributor

#16414

@alamb alamb merged commit 36e823f into apache:main Jun 16, 2025
5 checks passed
@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Jun 16, 2025

Thanks again @comphead

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants